My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 5/25
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
17720
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440058
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 5/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2025 11:48:33 AM
Creation date
9/11/2025 3:59:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
FINAL INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 5/25
RECORD_ID
PR0440058
PE
4433 - LANDFILL DISPOSAL SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0004518
FACILITY_NAME
NORTH COUNTY LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
17720
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06512004
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
Site Address
17720 E HARNEY LN LODI 95240
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
434
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />North County Recycling Center and Sanitary Landfill Permit Revision Project <br />Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration · San Joaquin County | May 2025 <br />34 <br /> <br />liquefaction zone identified by the CGS (CGS 2024). Therefore, project activities would have no <br />impact related to landslides or liquefication due to seismic events. <br />b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? <br />No Impact <br />The project would not involve any construction activities, as it is limited to the expansion of <br />existing landfill operations. Surface soils within the project site have previously been disturbed <br />during previous construction and landfill operations. No additional grading or unplanned <br />excavation would occur, and existing erosion control methods will remain unchanged. Therefore, <br />the project would not result in substantial erosion or the loss of topsoil in relation to current <br />conditions, thus there would be no impact related to soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. <br />c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as <br />a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral <br />spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? <br />No Impact <br />Various soil units are present within the project area. The project would not expand the landfill’s <br />current footprint; the project is limited to operational activities within the landfill. No <br />construction or expansion activities would occur as a result of the project. Thus, there would be <br />no impact related to unstable soils. <br />d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 1 B of the Uniform Building Code, <br />creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? <br />No Impact <br />The proposed project does not entail construction or the expansion of existing facilities and <br />would not expand the landfill footprint. Furthermore, compliance with Title 27 of the California <br />Code of Regulations regarding landfill siting and operations has previously established the <br />project site as being suitable for landfill operations. Consequently, there would no impact related <br />to risk of damage as a result of expansive soils. <br />e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative <br />wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of <br />wastewater? <br />No Impact <br />The project would not include the construction of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal <br />systems. No impact would occur. <br />f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique <br />geologic feature? <br />Less-than-Significant with Mitigation Incorporated <br />The project site is an existing landfill and previous studies have not identified any <br />paleontological resources or unique geologic features. However unlikely, the potential for <br />paleontological resources to occur on the project site cannot be precluded, as the expansion of <br />the landfill’s operations will entail the excavation of modules within the project site. The project
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.