My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2026
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
1103
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232587
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 1:18:22 PM
Creation date
1/15/2026 8:01:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2026
RECORD_ID
PR0232587
PE
2361 - UST FACILITY
FACILITY_ID
FA0004521
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON USA #201761*
STREET_NUMBER
1103
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
21935038
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\kblackwell
Supplemental fields
Site Address
1103 S MAIN ST MANTECA 95337
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Underground Storage Tank <br /> Release Detection Equipment Testing Report Form <br /> 5. MONITORING SYSTEM AND PROGRAMMING <br /> A separate Release Detection Equipment Testing Report Form must be prepared for each <br /> monitoring systems. <br /> Manufacturer of Monitoring Model of Monitoring System Software Version installed <br /> System Control Panel Control Panel <br /> Veeder Root TLS-350 330.00 <br /> Attach the post-testing reports if the monitoring system is capable of generating Yes No, MA:. <br /> either.• V Monitoring System Set-up Report A Alarm History Report <br /> Is all release detection equipment that was tested operational per manufacturer's. 0 ❑ <br /> specifications? <br /> Is the secondary containment free of damage, debris, or liquid? 0 ❑ <br /> Are the release detection audible and visual alarms operational? 0 ❑ <br /> Have all sensors been: 1) visually inspected for wiring kinks, breaks and residual Z ❑ ❑ <br /> buildup on Floats; and 2) tested for functionality and confirmed operational? <br /> Are all sensors installed to detect a release at the earliest opportunity? Z ❑ ❑ <br /> Was the monitoring system set-up reviewed, and proper settings confirmed? 0 ❑ ❑ <br /> Was the monitoring system's backup battery visually inspected, functionally tested, 0 ❑ ❑ <br /> and confirmed operational? <br /> Was it confirmed that the Flow of hazardous substance stops at the dispenser if a 0 ❑ ❑ <br /> release is detected in the under-dispenser containment? <br /> Does the pressure supply pump automatically shut down if the piping secondary 0 ❑ ❑ <br /> containment monitoring system fails to operate or is disconnected? <br /> Does the pressure supply pump automatically shut down if the piping secondary <br /> containment monitoring system detects a release? Which sensors initiate positive ✓Z ❑ ❑ <br /> shut down? (Check all that apply) Z Containment Sump A UDC <br /> If re+ease detection alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring center, is all 0 ❑ ❑ <br /> communication equipment operational? <br /> If there is any buried single-wall suction hazardous substance piping, was it <br /> confirmed using the inspection method approved by the Unified Program Agency, 0 ❑ ❑ <br /> that the pipe contents drain back into the UST if the suction is released? <br /> Describe all answers marked 'No" or "Fail"and the proposed remedy in Section S. <br /> List alt equipment either replaced or repaired (including cleanings or adjustment) in Section B. <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.