Laserfiche WebLink
Martinez, Genesis [EHD] <br /> From: Andrew Francis <afrancis@lsce.com> <br /> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2022 2:16 PM <br /> To: ehsitemitigation [EHD] <br /> Cc: Gregory Gibson; Shih, Steven [EHD]; Eddy Teasdale; ggebhardt@ci.lathrop.ca.us; <br /> rodb@bradleyandsonsdrilling.com <br /> Subject: FW: Lathrop Test Well Permit <br /> Attachments: Work Plan.zip; Site-Mitigation-Well-and-Boring-Permit-Application-20220525.pdf <br /> CAUTION:This email is originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the <br /> sender and know the content is safe. <br /> Hi Jeff, <br /> Please see my responses below in red. <br /> The updated work plan and signed well permit application are attached. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Andrew <br /> From: ehsitemitigation [EHD] <ehsitemitigation@sigov.org> <br /> Sent:Thursday, May 19, 2022 5:20 PM <br /> To: Gregory Gibson <ggibson@ci.lath rop.ca.us>;Andrew Francis<afrancis@lsce.com>; ggebhardt@ci.lathrop.ca.us <br /> Cc: Eddy Teasdale<eteasdale@lsce.com>; rodb@bradlevandsonsdriIling.com; Shih, Steven [EHD] <sshih@slgov.org> <br /> Subject: RE: Lathrop Test Well Permit <br /> Gregory, Glenn,Andrew: <br /> The EHD has reviewed your work plan to install 3 nested monitoring wells in one 12-inch boring,for the purpose of <br /> eventually installing an Aquifer Recharge Well (ASR)well to inject water into the groundwater aquifer.The EHD has <br /> quite a few concerns regarding these wells that need to be addressed before EHD can move on to approving it: <br /> 1) Please provide document from State Water Resources Control Board which has authority over any ASR projects, <br /> that they have no objection to installing these monitoring wells for the purpose of future ASR <br /> - The purpose of the monitoring well is to first determine if an ASR project is feasible in this area. If the results <br /> from this initial investigation identify subsurface conditions that could support a future ASR project,then the <br /> City will initiate a discussion with SWRCB <br /> 2) EHD has concern with location of the monitoring wells if they're too close (10', 10 yards?)to the future ASR well. <br /> When monitoring wells are to be destroyed, cement grout will have to be placed/pumped into the well casings <br /> and the gravel/sand packs under possibly tremendous pressure. Given enough pressure the grout may have an <br /> adverse effect on any nearby wells. Please discuss how to mitigate this possibility(i.e. further distance between <br /> the MW and the ASR well?) <br /> - ASR well and monitoring well will be at least 30 feet apart.At present,there are not plans to destroy this <br /> well. <br /> 3) EHD requires Stove Pipe be installed instead of a traffic box <br /> - Stove pipe will be used. Monitoring well specifications have been added to work plan (Attachment B). See <br /> well specification included in updated work plan. Section 2.3.9 <br /> 1 <br />