My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU-2601102_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NEWTON
>
3732
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-2601102_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2026 3:30:02 PM
Creation date
2/17/2026 3:23:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU-2601102
PE
2602 - SOIL SUITABILITY AND NITRATE LOADING STUDY REVIEW
STREET_NUMBER
3732
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
NEWTON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
13206016
CURRENT_STATUS
In Review
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
3732 N NEWTON RD STOCKTON 95205
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> �AaUIN' SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> •. P Telephone:(209)468-3420 Fax:(209)468-3877 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> 00— <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> ,ShaRi rhgf rux ►'rmilial PA#: pG- 212-+,Su�161� <br /> KITEOCATION: ' `112 1�I O r�-r1� �(n,,rf�1/� <br /> 11 G 1`l K-1Y � I V.C�W I UI 1 ft" , REPORT DATE: _JarjL)U-6 <br /> 2� <br /> S = Sufficient <br /> I = Insufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1 5,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> 17" constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER <br /> GANALYSIS <br /> ❑ 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> �] ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. <br /> I���G1n I�fZir2� D(�:°�� hearzbv� <br /> ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. <br /> E, ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. <br /> ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. <br /> l 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL <br /> ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. <br /> ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern, at and/or around the project site. 66MI'YIQa(,I d[I w rlefFm <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> y ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> lyJ ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: Reviewed Date: <br /> U 21&U <br /> EHD 26-02 Page 1 of 2 Nitrate Loading Study Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.