Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Pete Giambanco, Sr . _ MAY 201993 <br /> Claim No . <br /> Final Division Decision <br /> Page 2 <br /> The county makes a clear distinction in s permit letter between <br /> permit compliance and payment of fees . Payment of fees alone <br /> does not constitute compliance ; this is but one Sequent of the <br /> permit requirement .n From 1990 on there was no evidence of <br /> permits i he ty' s file. It a the en of permit <br /> documents in the file that used the - reviewing estaff quire <br /> about permit compliance . County staff verbally related that this <br /> was due to non-compliance with precisiou testing requirements . <br /> Section 2811 (a) (2)m requires that a claimant to the Fund . . had <br /> and has obtained any permit or permits required of the claimant <br /> pursuant to Chapter 6 n 20 , of the California Health <br /> and Safety Code . . . ° (Emphasis added . ) <br /> In addition, Section 2610 . 1 (b) provides that "purchasers of real <br /> property. . . on which an underground storage tank is situated may <br /> t f ' 1 1 theFund if : (1) the purchaser o <br /> acquirer knew mtha[ underground s rage task w s located on <br /> the real property being acquired;and (2 ) any Party from whom the <br /> real P poorly was acauired would not have been eligiblefor <br /> reimbursement from the Fund. " (Emphasis added . ) <br /> because the former owner, Shaughnessy, was <br /> of compliance with <br /> permit requirements, Giambanco i eligible claimant to the <br /> Fund. In addition, Giambanco was also found to be out of <br /> compliance with permit requirements , even though he did pay the <br /> fees . <br /> With regard to the issue <br /> of non-compliance with county corrective y c ive <br /> action directives , the following chronology was found in the <br /> county' e site file : <br /> 8/16/90 Giambanco purchased vintage Car Wash located at 601 <br /> East Miner, Stockton . <br /> 12/4/90 Site inspection reveals that site and tanks are out of <br /> compliance with UST permit laws . The following <br /> violations were documented; 1) no inventory reconciliation records, 2 ) no precision test results <br /> accessible at site, 3 ) UST p3 abandoned without county <br /> approval . Corrections required by 1/5/91 . Condition <br /> not met . <br /> 'All citations <br /> e found i the Petroleum Underground Storage <br /> Took Cleanup Fund Regulations, Title 23 , Division 3 Chapter 18 of <br /> the California Code of Regulations dated December 2 , 1991 . <br />