My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2026
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
D
>
DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR
>
508
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231057
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2026 3:12:32 PM
Creation date
4/3/2026 11:11:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2026
RECORD_ID
PR0231057
PE
2361 - UST FACILITY
FACILITY_ID
FA0003720
FACILITY_NAME
CHARTER WAY PETRO INC.
STREET_NUMBER
508
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16504016
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\bmascaro
Supplemental fields
Site Address
508 W DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD STOCKTON 95206
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Underground Storage Tank <br /> Secondary Containment Testing Report Form <br /> 9. COMMENTS <br /> Mast=Master. Siph=Siphon. PS=Piping Sump. Western FG=Western Fiberglass. <br /> BP=Bottom Penetrations. <br /> Note: Tank #2 Regular 87 Siphon, and Tank #3 Super 91 Tank Secondary Containment Sensor L3 <br /> and Sensor L5 were in alarm when i arrived on site. I found both of the Tank Secondary <br /> Containment Riser Caps loose. When i removed the sensors for testing, the alarms cleared. I <br /> found 3/4" of water in both of the Tank Secondary Containments. I removed approximately 20 <br /> ounces of water total from both of the Tank Secondary Containments prior to testing. The water <br /> appeared dirty and sandy, and mirrored the back fill soil material around both of the Tank Secondary <br /> Containment Risers. No smell of fuel present. I applied the Test Vacuum of -10" Hg. for one hour <br /> on both of the Tank Secondary Containments, and no loss of Test Vacuum was detected throughout <br /> the test periods. Possible source of water in both of the Tank Secondary Containments was surface <br /> run off that entered the Tank Secondary Containment through the loose caps on both of the Tank <br /> Secondary Containment Risers. After the Tank Secondary Containment testing was complete, i <br /> placed the sensors back to their proper placement and no further alarms were detected. I applied <br /> Pipe sealant compound to all of the Tank Secondary Containment riser threads to make a proper <br /> seal. I instructed the Owner/Operator to log the alarms in the onsite alarm log with a description of <br /> the alarm event. I advised the Owner/Operator to make sure these Secondary Containment Riser <br /> Caps are secure after all testing events in the future to prevent surface water run off from entering <br /> the Tank Secondary Containment. <br /> All tests marked "Fail'and any repairs made before or during the tightness test must be described in <br /> the COMMENTS section. <br /> Page 5 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.