Laserfiche WebLink
rt <br /> e TanK ott RepO <br /> tora9 ectl ' <br /> a 5 sP <br /> Undergroutor Viso <br /> fn ---- y. <br /> Hated US1 Opera J f_ . AC ION yes from <br /> Section 3. # ids <br /> Deslg _ pw"UP ce Iss - <br /> N OF FoLL_ 'cornpl � <br /> OR DEScRI�and t ao PproPnate <br /> M available. q 1 <br /> 4 ; <br /> oWNERIoPERAT-__ to corresP order on site <br /> when , <br /> Number the follow up actions ace <br /> work <br /> tch ce�fi,d techni nand PI <br /> 1. Will di, <br /> T F�f <br /> Ll <br /> _r <br /> I.--' g1 <br /> TOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF INSPECTION RESULTS and provided a <br /> 6. OWNER/OPERA <br /> n to correct any compliance issues discovered <br /> I have reviewed the results of the designated UST operator inspection re -- <br /> description of the actions) taken or t- ' <br /> I` Name of UST Owner/ Operator (print) Garry Avneet UDC <br /> Date Signed <br /> UST Owner/Operator Signature <br /> ' <br /> 7. INSPECTION HISTORY — —= <br /> Has each follow-up action of Section 3 from the previous Designated UST Yes <br /> No <br /> 0 Operator Inspection Report been completed appropriately? ❑ ❑ __ <br /> Attach documentation verifying appropriate service to this report.) <br /> tt - <br /> 1 RELEASE DETECTION ALARM HISTORY <br /> )040 <br /> Attach a copy of the alarm history report/log to this report. Yes No� - <br /> i <br /> Is the monitoring system powered on and in proper operating mode? [3 <br /> Has each alarm since the previous inspection been responded to appropriately? <br /> (Attach documentation verifying appropriate service to this report.) ❑ y�► <br /> Have all containment sumps, that have had an alarm since the previous <br /> designated UST operator inspection report, been responded to by a qualified ❑ <br /> service technician? N <br /> All answers marked 'No"must be described by the designated UST operator in Section I <br /> 1 <br />