Laserfiche WebLink
On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 1:50 PM James, Andrew[EHD] <ajames sjgov.org>wrote: <br /> Hello Anna, <br /> To respond to your statement previously on the violation numbers—this is a known issue. Our system <br /> currently isn't aligning the correct hazardous waste violation numbers with the RTC. It is confusing. <br /> In regards to the violations: <br /> 23: Resolved. Please note in the future that when oil begins accumulating in a container, it must be <br /> Labelled with the accumulation start date. <br /> 26: Unresolved. Refer to attached photo for clarification.The violation was in reference to a white, oil <br /> drip pan. If the oil drip pan is used to storage hazardous waste,then it must be properly labelled. <br /> Resubmit the RTC with a statement on corrective action and any supporting documentation if <br /> necessary. <br /> 28: Unresolved. See 26. If the oil drip pan is used to store hazardous waste, then it must contain a lid or <br /> similar to ensure it remains closed except when adding or removing oil. Resubmit the RTC with a <br /> statement on corrective action and any supporting documentation if necessary. <br /> 54: Unresolved. The secondary container looks great! Please just fill out Violation 54 (83 on the RTC) <br /> with the correction date that you properly removed the oil and added the absorbent into the secondary. I <br /> know you wrote you were unclear what the violation was for on the RTC—you have already rectified the <br /> issue and just need the date and statement. <br /> Please let me know if you need any further clarification. <br /> Thankyou, <br /> 2 <br />