COMPLIANCE INFO_2026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

HMBP: • Violation #2—Closed • Violation #3—Closed • Violation #4—Open. Nothing was submitted for this. Please provide a corrective action statement that indicates the facility's plan to prevent this from being a compliance issue in the future. • Violation #10—Open.The treated wood waste was not added to the inventory. • Violation #13—Open.The site map was not updated to include the storage location of the antifreeze tote and does not include the other contiguous properties where TWW piles were observed during the inspection. • Violation #16—Closed HazWaste: • Violation #3—Open. The QRG submitted does not meet the requirements of CCR 66262.262 (fortunately this is a very short, straight-forward section, but happy to answer any questions about it). Please see DTSC's example template attached. • Violation #6&#7—Open.The training records provided look to be for HMBP and Hazardous Waste topics are not mentioned (labeling, storage, recordkeeping, etc.). Documentation must include a List of training topics, date of training,job title, name of employee, written job description (qualifications and duties), and employee signed (or certified) record that documents the training. • Violation #8—Open. This is specifically for DOT training. Employees must be provided training commensurate with their responsibilities in relation to shipping hazardous waste. • Violation #14—Open.This violation is not related to TWW. Please see DTSC's guidance on eligible waste streams for consolidated manifesting. The waste streams observed on site that would likely have been transported on a consolidated manifest were used oil, antifreeze,filters, etc. • Violation #17—Open.The absorbent pads listed in the violation language of the report were not addressed. • Violation #24- Open.The form submitted does not list a baseline year and does not reference the most recent reporting year, 2022. • Violation #29—Closed 4/27/26 • Violation #31 —Open. I'm not sure if the white paper labels are meant to satisfy the requirements, but if so,they do not contain all the required information and the hazardous waste labels are not Legible enough to verify that all required information is there. Please see the language in the violation on the report for more details on what is needed for labeling. • Violation #34—Open.The photo provided for the labeling violation appears to be the same drum that was observed on site and appears to still have the open drain pan in the bung hole. • Violation #35—Open.As noted in the violation language, please provide supporting documentation that demonstrates hazardous waste areas are being inspected weekly. • Violation #54—Open. None of the observations listed in the violation language were addressed. • Violation #84—Open. Nothing submitted. Best, Lynsey Sammons Registered Environmental Health Specialist Cell: (209) 616-3067 Office: (209)468-3420 3