My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU-2601339_SSNL
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
10779
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SU-2601339_SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2026 10:44:18 AM
Creation date
5/27/2026 10:39:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SU-2601339
PE
2602 - SOIL SUITABILITY AND NITRATE LOADING STUDY REVIEW
STREET_NUMBER
10779
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
17750028
CURRENT_STATUS
In Review
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
10779 S AIRPORT WAY MANTECA 95336
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
oPQ�l" SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> .� ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> Telephone: (209)468-3420 Fax:(209)468-3877 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> qL/FORS\ <br /> NITRATE LOADING STUDY REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> FSITEOCATION: 9 merls F4w-VY1 PA#: PG(--?j B5V6) <br /> K1 olet 2( oo -2r3 J REPORT DATE: M q �1T'1 7 <br /> S = Sufficient Uv!i <br /> I = Insufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-1105,Section 9-1105.2 <br /> S I 1.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF SOIL <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of the chemical and physical properties of the soils underlying the site. <br /> ❑ 1.2 Description of the mass transport properties of the soils underlying the site with respect to nitrate and/or any other <br /> constituent of concern identified for the project site. <br /> 2.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS <br /> (yJ I <br /> ❑i 2.1 Description of: depth to groundwater, seasonal fluctuations of groundwater depth, directional flow and gradient. <br /> ❑ 2.2 Description/discussion of any existing or potential groundwater contamination issues in the general location of the <br /> site. 1'Gf l W*)t1(,t1 BUJ S0PC,(yJfft�1-s, g0le 1 N 1 i'W-31 l k RV pI ArzM lotpo t nA� <br /> ❑ 2.3 Description of the current use of groundwater at the site and of the future expected use of groundwater as related <br /> to the proposed development project. <br /> 3.0 SOURCES AND CALCULATED IMPACT OF NITRATE TO GROUNDWATER <br /> ❑ 3.1 Description of all current off-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater in the general up gradient area and the <br /> contribution of nitrate load from these sources to the project site. O l a�m a/I <br /> ® ❑ 3.2 Description of impact of rainfall contribution of nitrate load to the project site. (ICJ <br /> ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate load from <br /> these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.4 Description of all proposed future on-site sources of nitrate to soil and groundwater and the contribution of nitrate <br /> load from these sources to the project site. <br /> ❑ 3.5 Calculated mass balance of nitrogen loading considering all potential sources identified. Use of <br /> Hanztch/Finnemore, or other appropriate formula/model, if applicable. �"v U ncur� VJI P"CA I wcwol w <br /> ❑ 3.6 Calculated impact of nitrogen loading from site project to down gradient wells, rivers, lakes etc. eaf c2( 2 (:a(it <br /> (�WyLy <br /> 4.0 DISCUSSION OF NITRATE LOADING RESULTS RELATIVE TO PROPOSED METHOD fty <br /> OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL ii0 <br /> &t Im p <br /> ❑ 4.1 Discussion of total nitrate impact from proposed project. , <br /> ❑ 4.2 Description of the methods proposed to mitigate any known or future impact to soil and groundwater from nitrate, <br /> and/or any other constituent of concern, at and/or around the project site. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ❑ 5.1 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> �f ❑ 5.2 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in the report. <br /> Reviewed By: Reviewed Date: hna�n 2 1; <br /> I U <br /> 0 <br /> EHD 26-02 Page 1 of Nitrate Loading Study Checklist <br /> 7/14/2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.