Laserfiche WebLink
# Comment Response to Comment <br /> 7 Map of Rough and Ready Island Sites—Please include a figure The requested figure was added as Figure 2 to the memorandum. <br /> with the different sites at Rough and Ready Island identified in <br /> the Report. <br /> HERO Comments—24 January 2019 <br /> 1 COC Evaluation Data Gaps—HERO recommends revising the No additional sampling will be conducted during the data gaps <br /> Groundwater Data Gaps Site Investigation plan accordingly investigation, in response to regulatory comments on the COC <br /> after the COC Evaluation Report has been revised and finalized. Evaluation Report. <br /> 2 Sample Identifiers—For consistency with the previous grab The sample identifiers that are listed in the 2018 GMWP and <br /> groundwater samples collected during the Third Quarter Groundwater Data Gaps Site Investigation Memorandum will be <br /> groundwater monitoring event, HERO recommends using the used. <br /> same sample identifier.New grab groundwater sample locations <br /> should have new sample numbers to prevent confusion. <br /> 3a Site 4—additional sample location, HERO recommends adding See response to DTSC General Comment 3b. <br /> a grab groundwater sampling location to better delineate the <br /> eastern boundary of the cis-1,2-DCE contaminant plume since <br /> Inset C of Figure 4 shows an inferred boundary and grab <br /> groundwater samples are only proposed to delineate the western <br /> part of the plume. <br /> 3b Background VOC concentrations, HERO recommends There are no known source areas upgradient of the source area at <br /> providing information on the source of the VOCs upgradient of Site 4. <br /> the source area at Site 4.Also, HERO disagrees with the calling <br /> of off-site migration of the VOC onto the site as"background <br /> VOCs"and recommends modifying the language in the <br /> "Proposed Samples" information for Site 4 to specifically refer <br /> to these VOCs by their upgradient source. <br /> Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Comments—7 January 2019 <br /> 1 Issue: Several of the wells are yellow on the Investigation The wells in yellow were gauged for water levels in accordance <br /> figures. According to the Legend,these wells were only used with the DTSC and RWQCB approved 2018 GMWP. The <br /> for depth to water measurements and were not sampled for rationale for the wells being gauged only or gauged and sampled is <br /> COCs. It is unclear whether these wells can be sampled for included in Table 7 of the 2018 GMWP and is based on the <br /> COC analyses. It may be possible these wells were non-detect Conceptual Site Model presented in the 2018 GMWP. The future <br /> for COCs in previous sampling events, but that information is proposed monitoring program based on the third quarter 2018 <br /> 5 08.03.2019 <br />