My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2201
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544282
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2026 11:06:17 AM
Creation date
6/23/2026 9:01:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0544282
PE
2965 - RWQCB LEAD AGENCY WASTE DISCHARGE SITE
FACILITY_ID
FA0025168
FACILITY_NAME
ROUGH AND READY ISLAND, PORT OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
2201
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
16203007
CURRENT_STATUS
Active, billable
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
2201 WASHINGTON ST STOCKTON 95203
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geosyntec <br /> consultants <br /> msl)towards the lower elevation groundwater underlying RRI (1 to 12 feet below msl). <br /> The Stockton Deep Water Channel is up to 29 feet deeper than Burns Cutoff and has a <br /> larger influence on RRI groundwater than Burns Cutoff or the San Joaquin River because <br /> it intersects a much larger cross-section of the water-bearing zone (Tetra Tech, 2002). <br /> Surface water elevations in all three surface water bodies should be almost identical at <br /> any given time. <br /> Figure 10 shows a comparison of groundwater elevations in monitoring wells along the <br /> perimeter of RRI to surface water elevations measured at USGS stream gauge 11304810 <br /> in the San Joaquin River. The surface water elevations are always higher than the <br /> groundwater elevations, indicating that recharge from the surface water bodies and <br /> inward gradients towards the interior of RRI are continuously maintained within the top <br /> 70 to 80 feet bgs water-bearing zone and there is no tidal influence on the groundwater <br /> flow direction. <br /> Within the interior of RRI, the groundwater has a general westward flow direction from <br /> Site 4 in the east,which has the highest groundwater elevations,towards the landfill sites <br /> in the west,which have the lowest groundwater elevations(Figure 11; Appendix B).The <br /> interior groundwater flow at RRI appears to follow the drainage channel system, which <br /> discharges to the Burns Cutoff on the west side of RRI (Figure 11). <br /> Figure 11 shows the general estimated potentiometric surface at RRI. The mean surface <br /> water elevation during the fourth quarter 2015 from stream gauge 11304810 was used as <br /> the average groundwater elevation at the surface water and groundwater interface around <br /> the perimeter of RRI. Groundwater elevations were calculated based on depth to water <br /> measurements taken during the fourth quarter 2015 and the surveyed top of casing <br /> elevations. If the well was surveyed in 2007 the top of casing elevations from the ERS <br /> 2007 survey were used to calculate the groundwater elevation. If the well was not <br /> surveyed in 2007,then the 1990s Navy surveyed top of casing was used.The groundwater <br /> elevations from the fourth quarter 2015 were used to generate the potentiometric surface <br /> contours. As described above, the depth to water varies by about 2 to 5 feet between the <br /> dry and wet season and the depth to water measurements were taken over a three-month <br /> period. Therefore, the potentiometric contours may not be representative of the <br /> groundwater potentiometric surface at a specific time. However, they provide a general <br /> representation of the groundwater flow direction at RRI on an island-wide scale. <br /> RRI Groundwater Monitoring Work Plan 13 1 June 2018 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.