Laserfiche WebLink
Phone 209-948-0333 <br /> Direct 209-444-3119 <br /> Cell 209-986-6207 <br /> mo Fax 20'1-948-0423 <br /> STOCKTON <br /> EAST WATER E-mail: jbejarano@sewd net <br /> DISTRICT 6767 East Main Street <br /> www.sewd net Stocktor, CA 9521S <br /> TO: SJC Public Works—Permitting Division <br /> Jacob Bejarano Post Of-ice Box 5157 <br /> From: Jacob Bejarano-Stockton East Water District Assistant Engineer I Stockton. CA 95205 <br /> cc: <br /> Date: 8/3/2012 <br /> Re: Driveway Approach Permit <br /> Stockton East Water District(SEWD)is planning on constructing a construction entrance approach <br /> approximately 650 feet east of the Stockton Diverting Canal. Attached is a driveway encroachment <br /> permit and per our conversation, below are the answers to your department's previous comments. <br /> Project Specifics: <br /> • Construction hours will be Monday—Friday lam to 4pm. <br /> • The number of trucks utilizing the temporary driveway approach will be approximately 20 <br /> trucks per day during various operations throughout the project <br /> • Trucks are not planned to exit the driveway onto the eastbound lane. <br /> • The driveway will be removed and drainage swale reconstructed at the end of the project <br /> which is estimated at approximately 14 months of commencement of construction. <br /> Traffic Analysis: <br /> Using the above stated 20 trucks per day over an expected 6 hour delivery window, it is estimated that <br /> 3-4 trucks will utilize the driveway approach per hour. The analysis looked at queuing 1 to 8 trucks, <br /> turning left across Main Street,to determine the shortest sighting distance. Sighting distance is plotted <br /> on the Main Street profile with 4 trucks queued on the east bound lane(critical condition)and <br /> compared to the required Stopping Sight Distance of a vehicle traveling 55 mph,on a downgrade of <br /> -11.5%with a coefficient of friction of 0.35(wet conditions). It should be noted that a vehicle will <br /> actually travel upgrade through to a 0%grade for the most part of the stopping distance reducing the <br /> amount of clear roadway required to come to a full stop, however a conservative approach was taken <br /> which the analysis uses a downgrade of-11.5%throughout the entire stopping distance. A summary of <br /> the results is shown below. <br /> Table 1. <br /> Sighting Distance vs. ruck Queuing <br /> #of Trucks Queued 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 <br /> Line of Sight(ft.) 956 843 751 696 708- 723 759 1728 <br /> Required Stopping Sight Distance 631 ft. <br /> Source:Civil Engineers Reference Manual Eqn.78.43b <br /> The limiting sight distance(696 ft.)occurs when 4 trucks are queued at the driveway. Under this <br /> condign the sight distance is greater than the required Stopping Sight Distance by 65 feet. <br /> Based on the analysis,there is enough distance between the bridge and construction entrance to <br /> provide for safe stopping in wet weather conditions while trucks are queued. However,this is the worst t <br /> case scenario which when trucks are actively using the construction entrance,there will be some form <br /> Lffc control to warn oncoming traffic prior to arriving at the sighting distance. <br /> 1 - <br />