Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Gil Moore July 13, 2012 <br /> 6437 Banner Street, Lodi Page 3 of 3 <br /> Well Destruction Work flan <br /> between the older outer annular grout seal and the younger inner grout seal. This may <br /> be aggravated by silt and clay suspended in the eater in the well during the casing <br /> removal that may be trapped between the older and younger grouts_ A continuous pour <br /> means that each additional pour will intermingle and set up as one pour. <br /> Should the attempt to pull out the well casing be unsuccessful, movement of the casing <br /> without co-movement of the grout seal of even a fraction of an inch will break what seal <br /> exists between the casing and the annular grout seal. Jarring the casing without <br /> appreciable movement may do the same. This could create a vertical conduit between <br /> the well casing and the annular cement grout that may not be addressed by pressure <br /> grouting as proposed. <br /> The proposal to over-drilling the wells down to the saturated zone, presumes the annular <br /> grout seal maintains a good seal with the well casing in the saturated zone. This is <br /> applicable only with a bentonite grout seal, but not necessarily with a portland cement <br /> grout and a PVC casing, such as is the situation at the subject site. <br /> The 'popsicle' destruction method that EHD has found to be successful was applied on <br /> shallow wells of fifteen or less feet in depth and constructed with a neat cement grout <br /> seal of not more than five feet below grade. The well is removed by pulling out all in one <br /> piece the surface cement pedestal, casing; and intact cement grout adhered to the <br /> casing. The filter pack remained at the bottom of the well. EHD has determined that it is <br /> less of a concern if the filter pack remains at the bottom of the well in the sand strata and <br /> that this method meets the intent of Section 13.17.6, of the Standards. <br /> Due to the issues noted above, the proposed AGE 'popsicle' method is acceptable provided the <br /> casing is successfully removed and the entire cement seal remains attached on the removed <br /> casing. If the casing is not removed entirely, or the original cement seal remains in parts or <br /> entirely adhered to the borehole, then the well and boring must be over-drilled to full depth of <br /> the original well to remove all materials used to construct the well. The resulting borehole rnust <br /> then be sealed from bottom to surface with an approved sealant that is under pressure using a <br /> tremie pipe. <br /> If you have any comments and/or questions, please contact Nuel Henderson at the address <br /> noted on this correspondence or telephone him at (209) 468-3436. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Nuel Henderson, PG ✓Adrienne Ellsaesser <br /> Engineering Geologist Acting Program Coordinator <br /> c: CVRWQCB—James Barton, Sacramento <br /> c: SWRCB-CUF -- Mark Owens, Sacramento <br /> c: San Joaquin County 'UMD -- Steve Winkler <br /> U AGE —Timothy Cuellar <br />