RECORD OF SURVEY 38-012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3940b 1p —vr-- v v v v v v v v v v v 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 SURVEYOR'S NOTES SURVEYOR'S NOTE 6- 1 SURVEYOR'S NOTE 12- 1 SURVEYOR'S NOTE 13-2 RECORD OF SURVEY ALIGNMENT OF THE FINE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE POTTER CREEK NEAR BOUNDARY: THE BOUNDARY COMMON TO THE DESPITE A DILIGENT SEARCH, KSN WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE DEEDS NORTH-SOUTH �/ SECTION LINE OF SECTION 36: KSN WAS UNABLE PARCEL DESCRIBED IN IN 79054747 AND "PARCEL D" AS DESCRIBED CONVEYING RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY FOR FINE BEING A PORTION OF SECTIONS 18 19 AND 30 TO OBTAIN A DEED FOR THE FINE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY IN SECTION IN DN 2005-178890 (R04) IS DESCRIBED ONLY WITH BEARING AND ROAD ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PARCELS ESTABLISHED ON THIS TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH RANGE 9 EAST AN A 36. (SEE SURVEYOR'S NOTE 16-1). THE DESCRIPTION FOR THE DISTANCE CALLS. NO CONTROLLING CALLS ARE USED FOR THIS SURVEY. A COPY OF THE RECORDING NUMBERS FOR ANY DEEDS D SECTIONS A FINE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY KSN OBTAINED IN THE SAN JOAQUIN COMMON BOUNDARY IN EITHER DOCUMENT. THAT INCLUDES ANY CONVEYING THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY WAS REQUESTED BY KSN FROM 231 24, 25, 269 AND 36, TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISOR'S MINUTES INDICATED THE CALLS THAT WOULD LOCATE THE COMMON BOUNDARY ALONG SOME THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SURVEYOR'S OFFICE. HOWEVER, NO RANGE 8 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE & MERIDIAN, RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE IS THE NORTH-SOUTH �/ SECTION LINE FEATURE OF POTTER CREEK. HOWEVER, KSN FOUND THE DEED WAS PROVIDED. RESEARCH PERFORMED BY KSN AT THE SAN SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, CALIFORNIA OF SECTION 36. NO FILED SURVEY MAP THAT KSN DISCOVERED IN MONUMENTS MARKING THIS COMMON BOUNDARY SET ON OR NEAR JOAQUIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY DID PRODUCE A DESCRIPTION ITS RESEARCH IDENTIFIED THE �/ SECTION CORNER OF SECTION 36 THE TOP BANK OF THE SOUTH BANK OF POTTER CREEK. THERE IS OF THE FINE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY IN SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY BOARD PREPARED BY: AND LABELED IT AS SUCH. THERE ARE ALTERNATE POSITIONS FOR NOT A CLEAR STATEMENT IN EITHER DOCUMENT INDICATING IF THIS OF SUPERVISOR MINUTES, BOOK "E", PAGE 509. KSN USED THIS KJELDSEN SINNOCK & NEUDECK INC. THE CENTERLINE OF THE FINE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (AND ALSO COMMON BOUNDARY WAS INTENDED TO BE A RIPARIAN BOUNDARY. DESCRIPTION TO ESTABLISH THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHOWN ON THIS THE NORTH-SOUTH �/ SECTION LINE) OF SECTION 36 SHOWN ON (IN CONTRAST, R04 CONTAINS A CLEAR STATEMENT THAT THE MAP. R20 SHOWS THIS SAME SEGMENT OF FINE ROAD CIVIL ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS THE DIFFERENT FILED SURVEY MAPS IN SECTION 36. THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN "PARCEL A" OF PM 6-166 AND "PARCEL A" RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH A 60' WIDTH, BUT DOES NOT INDICATE HOW STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA FEBRUARY, 2013 DIFFERENCES IN THESE SOLUTIONS ARE ALSO REPRESENTED ON [SUBJECT PARCEL] IS NOT TO BE RIPARIAN.) KSN WANTS THE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH OR ALIGNMENT WAS ESTABLISHED ON THE GROUND BY A NUMBER OF MONUMENTS SET TO MARK THE READER TO BE AWARE OF THIS POSSIBLE AMBIGUITY IN THE THE SURVEY. KSN DID NOT DETERMINE THE QUALITY OR TYPE OF B CENTERLINE OR RIGHT-OF-WAY SIDE LINES. THESE MONUMENTS BOUNDARY RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN RIGHT-OF-WAY HELD BY SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY FOR FINE ROAD AS SHEET PURPOSE B ARE IN CONFLICT WITH ONE ANOTHER, AND DO NOT REPRESENT THESE TWO PARCELS. PART OF THIS SURVEY. PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHTS OR OTHER SURVEYOR'S NOTES THE SAME ALIGNMENT OR A CONSISTENT (PARALLEL) RIGHT-OF-WAY "UNWRITTEN RIGHTS" FOR THE FINE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY MAY WIDTH FOR THE FINE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS IS LIKELY ASURVEYORS NOTE 12-2' EXIST ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PARCELS ESTABLISHED ON THIS MATERIAL DISCREPANCY AS DEFINED BY SECTION 8762 OF THE THE LAND DESCRIPTION IN THE "GRANT DEED" RECORDED IN AS SURVEY CALIFORNIA BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE. R151 (DN 2011 -106028) DESCRIBES A FEE PARCEL THAT IS SURVEYOR'S NOTE 14- 1 KSN HAS COMPLETED A FULL SECTION BREAKDOWN OF SECTION 36. APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET SQUARE. THE LAND DESCRIPTION DOES POTTER CREEK NEAR BOUNDARY: THE BOUNDARY COMMON TO SURVEYOR'S NOTE 16- 1 THIS INCLUDED LOCATING AND IDENTIFYING ALL OF THE �/ SECTION NOT CLEARLY INDICATE THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE NORTH "PARCEL A" (R20) AND "PARCEL A" (R04) IS DESCRIBED ONLY WITH KSN WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE DOCUMENTS IN ITS RESEARCH THAT CORNERS OF THE SECTION. WE ESTABLISHED THE NORTH-SOUTH 1/4 BOUNDARY SECTION LINE OR SOUTH SECTION LINE OF SECTION BOUNDARY OR EAST BOUNDARY OF THE FEE PARCEL WITH THE 19. THIS BEARING AND DISTANCE CALLS. THE DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMON DEFINITIVELY DEFINE THE ALIGNMENT AND WIDTH OF MILTON ROAD SECTION LINE OF SECTION 36, AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE CREATES AMBIGUITY, AND RESULTS IN MULTIPLE ALTERNATIVES FOR BOUNDARY IN R04 CLEARLY DESCRIBED THE BOUNDARY IN A FIXED BETWEEN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 SECTION OF 25 AND THE NORTHWEST C CENTERLINE OF THE FINE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG A STRAIGHT THE RESOLUTION OF THE FEE PARCEL'S BOUNDARIESPOSITION REGARDLESS OF THE MOVEMENT OF POTTER CREEK. THIS 1/4 SECTION OF SECTION 36. THE ACTUAL DEEDS TRANSFERRING C LINE BETWEEN THE OPPOSITE 1/4 . IN THIS SECTION CORNERS IDENTIFIED ON WOULD INDICATE IT WAS NOT INTENDED AS A RIPARIAN BOUNDARY. RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY WOULD NEED TO BE THIS SURVEY AS PC26 AND PC29. THIS SOLUTION WILL NOT AGREE PARCEL AND "PARCEL C" OF DN 2005-178890 USING THE SURVEY WE ESTABLISHED THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN THIS R20 CONTAINS NO STATEMENTS REGARDING THE STATUS OF THIS OBTAINED AND REVIEWED, IF THEY EXIST, BEFORE A DEFINITIVE WITH THE DIFFERENT SETS OF RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENTS COMMON BOUNDARY AS A RIPARIAN BOUNDARY. IF R20 WAS THE R20 RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH AND ALIGNMENT COULD BE ESTABLISHED. IF CURRENTLY IN PLACE ON THE GROUND. KSN RECOGNIZES ITS FOLLOWING METHOD: VEHICLE USED TO SEPARATE "PARCEL A" " " ( ) FROM ATHE DEEDS DO NOT EXIST, IT IS LIKELY THAT THE PUBLIC HAS SOLUTION FOR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY MAY NOT BE DEFINITIVE. THERE 1 )THE DIRECTION OF THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE FEE (R04) THE STATEMENT IN R04 MAY BE THE ONLY EVIDENCE THAT ACQUIRED PRESCRIPTIVE RIGHTS TO USE THIS SEGMENT OF MILTON MAY BE VIABLE ALTERNATE SOLUTIONS TO THE LOCATION OF THE THE BOUNDARY IS FIXED AND NOT RIPARIAN. ROAD. CENTERLINE. THERE IS ALSO THE POSSIBILITY THAT THE PUBLIC OR PARCEL DESCRIBED IN R151 WAS HELD TO PRESERVE THE OTHER PRIVATE PARTIES HAVE ACQUIRED RIGHTS BY ADVERSE RECORD ANGLE BETWEEN THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY AND THE , BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES BOOK "B", AT PAGE 163, APPEARS POSSESSION OR PRESCRIPTION. KSN DID NOT ANALYZE ANY OF WEST SECTION LINE OF SECTION 19 AS THE ANGLE IS SURVEYORS NOTE 14-2 CALCULATED USING THE BEARINGS LISTED IN R151 . TO DESCRIBE AN 80 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR MILTON ROAD IN THESE POSSIBILITIES AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. THE COUNTY POTTER CREEK NEAR BOUNDARY: THE BOUNDARY COMMON TO THE THIS AREA. A COPY OF THESE MINUTES CAN BE OBTAINED FROM SURVEYOR WAS MADE AWARE OF THE POTENTIAL CONFLICT DURING 2)THE LENGTH OF THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY WAS HELD AT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN OR 2117-139 R137 AND "PARCEL A" AS KSN OR THE SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY. D THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. THE INTENT OF THIS NOTE IS THE RECORD AS DESCRIBED IN R151 . ( ) DESCRIBED IN DN 2005-178890 (R04) IS DESCRIBED ONLY WITH p TO NOTIFY OTHER LAND SURVEYORS AND THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE 3)THE DIRECTION OF THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE FEE CONFLICT WITH RECORD SURVEY DATA AND MONUMENTS IN THE PARCEL DESCRIBED IN R151 WAS HELD TO PRESERVE THE BEARING AND DISTANCE CALLS. NO CONTROLLING CALLS ARE USED OR 1083-124 DESCRIBES A 60 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR MILTON FOR THIS COMMON BOUNDARY IN EITHER DOCUMENT. THAT ROAD IMMEDIATELY EAST OF THIS SEGMENT. OTHER DEEDS, SUCH AS GROUND, AND TO MAKE THEM AWARE OF THE POTENTIAL FOR RECORD ANGLE BETWEEN THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY AND THE INCLUDES ANY CALLS THAT WOULD LOCATE THE COMMON BOUNDARY OR 199-139, CONVEY ADDITIONAL 10 FOOT STRIPS TO SAN JOAQUIN BOUNDARY AND TITLE CONFLICTS. NORTHERLY BOUNDARY AS THE ANGLE IS CALCULATED USING ALONG SOME FEATURE OF POTTER CREEK. HOWEVER, KSN FOUND COUNTY TO CREATE AN 80 FOOT WIDE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE MONUMENTS MARKING THIS COMMON BOUNDARY NEAR OR THE BEARINGS LISTED IN R151 . PORTIONS OF MILTON ROAD. THIS RECORD OF SURVEY SHOWS AN � SURVEYORS NOTE 6-2 4)THE LENGTH OF THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY WAS HELD AT THE WITHIN THE CHANNEL OF POTTER CREEK. THERE IS NOT A CLEAR APPROXIMATE RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH OF 60 FEET FOR MILTON ROAD ALIGNMENT OF THE OLD RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE RECORD AS DESCRIBED IN R151 , AS MEASURED FROM THE STATEMENT IN EITHER DOCUMENT INDICATING IF THIS COMMON BETWEEN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 SECTION OF 25 AND THE NORTHWEST EAST-WEST 1/4 SECTION LINE OF FLOOD ROAD.SECTION LINE OF SECTION 36: KSN LOCATED BOUNDARY WAS INTENDED TO BE A RIPARIAN BOUNDARY. (IN �/ SECTION OF SECTION 36. KSN DID NOT MAKE A FINAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY THROUGH THE CONTRAST, R04 CONTAINS A CLEAR STATEMENT THAT THE DETERMINATION OF THIS STATUS OF THIS SEGMENT OF MILTON ROAD MIDDLE OF SECTION 36, IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE ' BOUNDARY BETWEEN "PARCEL A" OF PM 6-166 AND "PARCEL A" RIGHT-OF-WAY AS PART OF THIS SURVEY. EAST-WEST 1/4 SECTION LINE OF SECTION 36. THESE DEEDS DID SURVEYORS NOTE 13- 1 [SUBJECT PARCEL] IS NOT TO BE RIPARIAN.) KSN WANTS THE E NOT CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT WOULD ALLOW KSN TO ESTABLISH FLOOD ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY: KSN USED TWO (2) DEEDS TO READER TO BE AWARE OF THIS POSSIBLE AMBIGUITY IN THE , E THE EAST-WEST �/ SECTION LINE THROUGH THE SECTION. KSN DID ESTABLISH THE FLOOD ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY WITHIN SECTIONS 24 BOUNDARY RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN SURVEYORS NOTE 16-2 NOT FIND ANY FILED SURVEY MAPS IN ITS RESEARCH FOR THE AND 19 ADJACENT TO THE SUBJECT PARCELS. THE FIRST IS THE THESE TWO PARCELS. DIETRICH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY: KSN USED OR 190-294 TO PROJECT THAT LOCATED BOTH THE WEST �/ SECTION CORNER AND DEED RECORDED AS OR 3712-22. THE SECOND IS THE DEED ESTABLISH THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR DIETRICH ROAD IN THE THE EAST �/ SECTION CORNER AS NEEDED TO ESTABLISH THIS RECORDED AS A-58-46. (THIS SECOND DEED CONVEYS SURVEYORS NOTE 15- 1 NORTHWEST �/ OF SECTION 36 AND ADJACENT TO OUR SUBJECT RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. KSN WAS UNABLE LINE. KSN HAS COMPLETED A FULL SECTION BREAKDOWN OF PARCEL. THE CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT OF DIETRICH ROAD BASED ON TO LOCATE A SUBSEQUENT DEED THAT TRANSFERRED TITLE OF THE THE LAND DESCRIPTION IN THE "DEED OF TRUST AND ASSIGNMENT SECTION 36. THIS INCLUDED LOCATING AND IDENTIFYING ALL OF THE LAND DESCRIPTION IN THE DEED IS THE SECTION LINE COMMON THE 1/4 SECTION CORNERS OF THE SECTION. WE ESTABLISHED THE RIGHT-OF-WAY TO SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY.) THE LAND DESCRIPTION OF RENTS" RECORDED IN R146 (OR 3349-446) DESCRIBES A FEE TO SECTIONS 35 AND 36. THE RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH LISTED IN THIS FOR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IN A-58-46 IS DIFFICULT TO READ. IT PARCEL THAT IS APPROXIMATELY 468 FEET SQUARE. THE LAND DEED IS 20 FEET. EAST-WEST �/ SECTION LINE OF SECTION 36, AND SUBSEQUENTLY (THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LISTED IN THE ADJACENT DOES NOT APPEAR TO CONTAIN RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR FLOOD ROAD DESCRIPTION CONTAINS DISTANCES, BUT USES GENERAL DIRECTION ROAD DEED, OR 190-290 IS ALSO 20 FEET, CREATING A COMBINED THE CENTERLINE OF THE FINE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG A IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4SECTION OF SECTION 19, INCLUDING THE CALLS AND LACKS CONTROLLING CALLS FOR ELEMENTS OF THE STRAIGHT LINE BETWEEN THE OPPOSITE 1/4 SECTION CORNERS PLSS ADJOINING PARCELSOR MONUMENTSTHIS CREATES WIDTH OF 40 FEET.) KSN DID NOT VERIFY THE EXISTENCE OF F PORTION ADJACENT TO "PARCEL C" (R04). KSN WAS NOT ABLE TO , . DEDICATIONS OF ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY OR OTHER DOCUMENTS F IDENTIFIED ON THIS SURVEY AS PC25 AND PC39. LOCATE A DEED IN ITS RESEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORD THAT AMBIGUITY, AND RESULTS IN MULTIPLE ALTERNATIVES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF THE FEE PARCEL'S BOUNDARIES. IN THIS SURVEY RELATED TO THE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY CREATED AFTER THE DATE DESCRIBED THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY. THESE TWO (2) DEEDS WERE RECORDED. IF SUCH DOCUMENTS ARE THE ALIGNMENT OF THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE AND WE ESTABLISHED THE COMMON BOUNDARY BETWEEN THIS PARCEL THE ALIGNMENT OF THE EAST-WEST Y4 SECTION LINE ARE NOT AND "PARCEL A" OF DN 2005-178890 USING THE FOLLOWING DISCOVERED AND PROVIDED TO KSN, A REVISION OF THE ROAD METHOD: RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR DIETRICH ROAD ESTABLISHED ON THIS SURVEY PARALLEL AS ESTABLISHED ON THIS SURVEY. IF PREVIOUS LAND MAY BE NEEDED. SURVEYORS HAVE USED THE ALIGNMENT OF THE RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO DETERMINE THE LOCATION OF ALIQUOT PARCELS 1 )THE DIRECTION OF THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE FEE (OR PORTIONS OF ALIQUOT PARCELS) THEY ARE SURVEYING WITHIN PARCEL DESCRIBED IN R146 WAS HELD PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH THE SECTION, THEIR BOUNDARY RESOLUTIONS WILL NOT AGREE WITH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST �/ SECTION OF SECTION 25 AS A BOUNDARY RESOLUTION BASED ON OUR SECTION BREAKDOWN. ESTABLISHED ON THIS SURVEY. (SEE R113 AS AN EXAMPLE.) 2)THE LENGTH OF THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY WAS HELD AT THE G RECORD AS DESCRIBED IN R146. G 3)THE DIRECTION OF THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE FEE PARCEL DESCRIBED IN R146 WAS HELD PARALLEL TO THE NORTH-SOUTH �/ SECTION LINE OF BORDERING THE SOUTHWEST �/ SECTION OF SECTION 25 AS ESTABLISHED ON THIS SURVEY. 4)THE LENGTH OF THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY WAS HELD AT THE RECORD AS DESCRIBED IN R146. SHEET 19 OF 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11