RECORD OF SURVEY 38-018 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

38 � I ? RECORD OF allRVEY FD. FOUND FOUND BOLT (R1)(R3)(R4)(R6)(R7)(R8) Of I.R. IRON ROD ch I.P. IRON PIND IR Co (M) MEASURED - ;""� HIL - � ° APORTION OF SECTION 83 SECTION SEC. o� AiR N F - cA° p C.M. WEBER GRANT DOC DOCUMENT SCALE: N 1" = 100' �' - "" p a� --0 FD. MONUMENT AS NOTED X CALCULATED POINTlip ' San Joaquin County, O FD MONUMENT PER RS 37-6 U, ul R.S. RECORD OF SURVEY RS 20-76 � � Ca/l*fom la 'c9 c.►a P.M. PARCEL MAP U' ,,`'- R W RIGHT OF WAY � � SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS FD. PK NAIL (NO REF.) COR. CORNER N MAY, 2013 MON. MONUMENT PS 37- 6 CENTERLINE DION & MURPHY D.N. DOCUMENT NUMBER S 71°58'00" W 30.00' (M) J � CONSULTING CI WL ENGINEERS n.N. f�00r� 2 ��_�9� o� RS 17-26 ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING BOUNDARY DETERMINATION NOTES ,o 66-23'(R2) (M) N 1. AFTER REVIEWING DEEDS IN THIS VICINITY, I HAVE �0' � / / CONCLUDED THAT COLLECTIVELY, THERE ARE �?°` 01BASIS OF BEARINGS: CONTRADICTIONS AMONGST THE DEEDS. DETERMINING / 30' �0 THE INTENT OF INDIVIDUAL DEEDS IS SUBJECT TO SEE BOUNDARY DETERMINATION NOTES / THE WEST RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF ALPINE ROAD WHICH INTERPRETATION. / BEARS SOUTH 18°02'00" EAST AS SHOWN IN BOOK 5 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE 115, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY RECORDS. 2. THERE WAS NOT A FORMAL "STATEMENT OF PURPOSE" ON R.S. 37-06. BASED ON CONVERSATIONS WITH THE SURVEYOR, IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE / 166-32'(R2) MONUMENTS SET: PURPOSE FOR (R4) WAS TO ESTABLISH THE BOUNDARY / OF D.N. 2005-243791. (R4) WAS NOT FILED TO / 3/4" X 30" IRON ROD WITH CAP STAMPED LS 7269 AND SHOWN DETERMINE THE BOUNDARY OF D.N. 2003-251939, ,O / ---0— , UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. BOTH (R2) AND (R5) REFERENCE A PORTION OF p� �''�ty/ THE BOUNDARY TO BE ALONG A FENCE LINE. I HAVE SMLEAdENI QF PUREQ5E RESEARCHED THE CHAIN OF DEEDS BACK TO 1894. IT IS MY BELIEF THAT THE FEW FENCE POSTS SHOWN ON / TO ESTABLISH THE METES AND BOUNDS NORTH PROPERTY LINE BOUNDARY DETERMINATION BASED ON (R4) (R4) ARE N NT THE FROM 894 E DEEDS.IAACCEP ACCEPTING THE ''W /L FENCE AS / (THIS DEPICTION NOT BASED ON AFIELD SURVEY. �. OF DOC. #2003-251939 DESCRIBED EXISTING FENCE AS A CONTROLLING ELEMENT OF THE �0°20 2 SHOWN GRAPHICALLY FOR THE PURPOSES OF BOUNDARY REQUIRES ASSUMING THE CURRENT FENCE S86°34'00)V S X00 SHOWING THE MAGNITUDE OF �� SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT. IS IN THE EXACT SAME LOCATION AS THE FENCE 94,38DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THIS MAP p SEE NOTE 11. p� THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS A SURVEY MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DESCRIBED IN 1894. -^ _-- �-- 215°27'(R2) AND (R4).) DIRECTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROFESSIONAL 4. TESTIMONY FROM THE OWNERS OF (R2) AS WELL No LAND SURVEYORS' ACT AT THE REQUEST OF AMBER PENCE AS OTHERS CONFIRM MY DISMISSING THE FENCE AS 196-14 (R2) cs� THE ORIGINAL FENCE DESCRIBED IN (R2) AND (R5). N� IN APRIL, 2011. N THE OWNERS OF (R2) AND (R5) COULD NOT CONFIRM THE LOCATION OF THE CURRENT FENCE AS BEING IN THE DATED THIS DAY OF 2013. SAME LOCATION AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM 1894. 5. (R3) SHOWS THE BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN (R2) AND (R5) AS THE SLOUGH BOTTOM WHICH MORE CLOSELY MATCHES MY BOUNDARY DETERMINATION J E URPHY L.S. 7269 ` RATHER THAN (R4) BOUNDARY DETERMINATION. (R3) D.N. #2003-251939 LkQFKSE EXPIRATION DATE: 12-31-14 ACTUALLY CALLS THE SLOUGH BOTTOM THE PROPERTY LINE. THAT BELIEF HAS BEEN HELD BY SOME LAND OWNERS IN THE AREA FOR THE PAST 43 YEARS. &RK)0*S STATEMENT: IN 1970, (WHEN (R3) RECORDED) THE TANAKA FAMILY OWNED THE PROPERTY REPRESENTED IN (R5) AND THEY STILL THIS MAP HAS BEEN EXAMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8766 OF THE OWNED THE PROPERTY WHEN (R4) RECORDED IN 2008. 2 Doc N: 2013-066454 6. (R4) PORTRAYS EIGHT BEARING CHANGES ALONG THE 05/20/2013 11:16:14 AM PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS' ACT THIS �� DAY OF /+�/.4� Page: 1 of 1 Fee: $10.00 ' NORTH BOUNDARY OF (R2). THIS IS INCONSISTENT Kenneth W Blakemore 2013. WITH (R2) AND THE BOUNDARY DETERMINED BY THIS MAP. San Joaquin County Recorders Paid By: SHOWN ON DOCUMENT Ii� QROFESS/pN� IIIi�� 7. (R2) AND (R5) STATE THE COMMON BOUNDARY D l�� #92087234 �� OMA$ M. " IS THE SOUTH. BANK" OF THE SLOUGH. (R4) NOTES THE FD 3/4 I.P. (R1)(NO TAG) CO COMMON BOUNDARY LINE IN PART AS THE TOP OF THE SOUTH BANK OF THE SLOUGH. NEITHER (R2) NOR (R5) CALL cc OUT THE "TOP" OF THE SLOUGH. N " — THOMAS M. GAU R.C.E. 26994 * No. 26994 8. (R3) BELIEVED THE 534.93' DISTANCE SHOULD BE ' _ _ COUNTY SURVEYOR EXP.3_31 2015 MEASURED FROM THE CENTERLINE OF FAIRCHILD ROAD. --'FD!~3/4" I.P. (R1) � REGISTRATION EXPIRATION DATE: 3-31-15 s e'V 1� 9. THE LOCATION OF THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN (R5) AND (NO TAG) �qTF (R2) IS PORTRAYED DIFFERENTLY ON A FILED MAP FROM 1970 Co. -F CALF O� � Jcn (R3) AND FROM A FILED MAP FROM 1977 (R1). THIS SEVEN - YEAR PERIOD MAY BE WHEN THE FENCE WAS RELOCATED. - " _ " FD 3/4" I.P. (R1)(NQ TAG) D '� • ___-- RECORDERS STA M 10. FUTURE SURVEYORS WHO CHOOSE TO IGNORE ANY OR ""-~" 003 ALL OF THE PREVIOUS NINE NOTES COULD DERIVE AT A DIFFERENT _ Np s FILED THIS DAY OF M P;V 2013, AT q.M. BOUNDARY DETERMINATION FROM THIS MAP OR OTHER RECORDREFERENCES: > 2 MAPS IN THE VICINITY. IN BOOK 31S OF SURVEYS, AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST 11. MONUMENT AT TOP OF SOUTH BANK OF SLOUGH (R4). (R1) PM 5-115 Fm 5-1 15 OF JOE MURPHY 0 (R2) D.N. 2003-251939 0 �" COUNTY SURVEYOR'S NOTE: (R3) RS 20-76 p P -� FEE. D THIS SURVEY DEPICTS AN ALTERNATE LOCATION FOR THE (R4) RS 37-6 ' COMMON LINE BETWEEN THE PROPERTIES SHOWN HEREON, BASED (R5) Q.N. 2005-243791 UPON A DIFFERING INTERPRETATION OF THE EVIDENCE FOUND TO (R6) RS 18-100 BY' SUPPORT THE CALLS IN THE DEEDS INVOLVED, AND AS DESCRIBED (R7) RS 17-26 FD 3/4" I.P. (R1)(NO TAG) , IN BOUNDARY DETERMINATION NOTES NUMBER 10. �� 0 ENTH W. AKEMORE DEPUTY RECO ER (R8) RS 17-27 �0 ASS SS CLERK S:\2005\0558\Record of Survey.dwg