Laserfiche WebLink
' LAW OFFICES OF <br />r WILLIA-M A. SCHIICMNM -'L v <br />David J. Irey Pa --e7 <br />May 16, 2000 <br />Your pleading alleges three inconsistent quantities of carbon dioxide which you claim give <br />rise to various requirements. <br />As I am sure you are aware, H & S Code § 6382(a) requires that a substance is not hazardous <br />(and thus will not trigger a safety -plan requirement) unless it is in a physical state, volume or <br />concentration effecting health. Thus, without knowing what quantity you are alleging, I cannot <br />ascertain whether Carbon Dioxide is a hazardous substance as allegedly handled by the defendants. <br />Without your specifying what quantity is alleged, the defendant cannot relate your allegation <br />to the quantity that by law or regulation triggers a safety -plan requirement. <br />The defendants raise this issue for good reason as the notices provided to them by the <br />Government prior to your lawsuit quantified the Carbon Dioxide in pounds and alleged that <br />defendants' handling of quantities far less than 500 pounds triggered the requirement. Your <br />complaint alleges that the quantity handled by the defendants exceeded 500 pounds and is <br />inconsistent with the facts as previously alleged by the Government. <br />Compounding the deficiency of your pleading is your failure to allege that whatever quantity <br />You claim the defendants handled met the § 6382 threshold, thus failing to allege a violation of law <br />and causing the complaint to be demurrable under CCP § 430.1(e). <br />This entire matter may simply and easily be resolved by your stating which quantity you are <br />alleging and that such a quantity was in such a physical state, volume or quantity that it meets the <br />6382 threshold. If you are alleging that handling any of the three quantities triggers the <br />requirement regardless of whether that quantity effects health, just tell me that in writing and we can <br />proceed accordingly. <br />Separately, my client denies that he reneged on any settlement. The offer as he understood <br />it was to settle a disputed claim on a walkawav basis. Apparently you then attempted to change the <br />deal by requiring a judgment. If you have documentation to the contrary (such as a written offer <br />including the proposal for a judgment) please provide it to me immediately. <br />Yours very truly, --_i <br />WILLIAM A. SCHUCKMAN <br />WAS/jf <br />CC: Mr. George Badway <br />