Laserfiche WebLink
Osed to be, long ago, that Raytheon paid it. Then,when the Government <br /> bought it,the Program Office had contractors on-site pay it. So you're <br /> right. Until JAI,shouldn't belong to AWP. <br /> Since we have new issues here with using ODC for these types of things, is <br /> there any way we can add this to the money we send out to AWP for the <br /> electric bili on-site? <br /> If not,we'll have to come up with something creative. <br /> I'll cover this one here,can you or Jerry help us by adding this to our <br /> bill for SCK for after this year? I think that would make the eventual <br /> transition easier. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Jim <br /> message from: <br /> Jim Linney, PMP <br /> Federal Aviation Administration <br /> Terminal Radar Digitize, Replace, & Establish (TRDRE) Program Manager <br /> ATO-T Surveillance(ATB-440) <br /> 800 Independence Ave, S.W., FOB-10B Room 4-H-66 <br /> Washington, DC 20591 <br /> 02) 385-8712 <br /> 02)493-4886 Fax <br /> Jim.Linney@faa.gov <br /> -----------------FOR OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT USE ONLY------------------ <br /> I-------------------------------------> <br /> I I Greg Bachman I <br /> I I I <br /> 1 1 05/13/2004 06:131 <br /> 1 1 PM I <br /> I I I <br /> I--------------------------------------> <br /> ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I <br /> I I <br /> I To: Jim Linney/AWA/FAA@FAA I <br /> I oc: <br /> I Subject: Re:Permit fee for SCK ASR-11 I <br /> ----------------------•-------------------------------------------•-•-------------------------------•------------------------I <br /> This is yours? <br /> The first bill I've seen in all the time the ASR-11 has been there. <br /> • <br />