My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
640
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0529779
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2018 11:38:00 AM
Creation date
9/26/2018 11:15:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0529779
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0019644
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER GENE GABBARD INC
STREET_NUMBER
640
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13906004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
640 N EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TMorelli
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gene Gabbard Inc. - 3 - 12 October 2004 <br /> 640 El Dorado Street, Stockton, San Joaquin County <br /> groundwater as a lost resource. Also,there may be other, innovative technologies available in the future <br /> to address problems of low quality groundwater resources. <br /> John stated that they were looking into active skimmer to replace the current passive skimmer for free <br /> product in the source are, possibly a belt skimmer that works in 2"diameter well. <br /> • Site closure criteria. <br /> Pat and John asked for closure criteria for site. I suggested they visit our website to download guidance <br /> documents for USTs. John said that our guidance is nebulous. I offered to work with John afterwards to <br /> clarify any specific questions on the guidance documents, but no questions were asked later. Pat said that <br /> every site gets different consideration for closure. I said that there is not a"One size fits all' approach to <br /> site closure, which is due to the complexities and uniqueness of each site (geology,hydrogeology), and <br /> that professional judgment is necessary to assess the progress made towards each site closure. The basic <br /> approach is in the Appendix A -Reports, Tri-Regional Board Staff Recommendation for Preliminary <br /> Investigations and Evaluation of Underground Storage Tank Sites, April 2004, which states the beneficial <br /> uses of groundwater must be protected. Pat said that they agree that each site is different. <br /> The meeting ended at 1040. John stayed behind a few minutes to discuss various investigative and <br /> remedial technologies with Nuel, Lori and myself. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> 0 Recycled Paper <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.