Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> 2.4 Recent Investigation <br /> • During the fourthuarter of 19§6 Emc <br /> q on of Sacramento dulled two new soil borings to gather data <br /> for preparation of a Risk-based Corrective Action Plan Emcon's report of the investigation is <br /> apparently stall in preparation One boring is located near MW-5, and one is located approximately <br /> 15 feet east of VE-1, This boring was completed as a vapor extraction well and was used for the <br /> remainder of the quarter in place of VE-1 "deep" The new well is screened from 35 to 55 feet and <br /> is referred to in this report as VE-2 <br /> 3.0 VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM OPERATION AND MONITORING <br /> 3.1 System Operation <br /> During the quarter, the system operated for a total of 1,945 hours (Appendix A) It operated for 29 <br /> days in October, 29 days in November, and 28 days in December During that period, 4,978,620 <br /> cubic feet of vapor were extracted This brings the total to over 60,000,000 cubic feet since July, <br /> 1994 The Air Quality Managment District operating permit was due to expire on January 1, 1997, <br /> and the unit was therefore shut down on December 31, 1996 Currently, the unit remains shut down <br /> pending a response from the San Joaquin County PHS/EHD to the Risk-based Corrective Action <br /> Report and Request for Closure that has been prepared by Emcon of Sacramento At this time, <br /> Apache has not applied for continuation of its operating permit <br /> • 3.2 Monitoring Summary <br /> The extraction unit's on-board computer monitors several important parameters of engine <br /> performance, including air flow rates, well vacuum, and volume of extracted vapor These data are <br /> recorded hourly and averaged over the 24-hour day The daily averages are shown in Appendix A <br /> Hydrocarbon concentrations in the vapor stream (influent soil gas) and effluent (combustion <br /> products) were manually monitored on a weekly basis with a Microtip HL2000, photo-ionization <br /> detector until it was stolen in mid-August Thereafter, concentrations were measured with a <br /> Microtip 2020 and/or a NhmRae detector In addition, vapor samples were collected from the VE-1 <br /> "shallow" influent line and four the VE-2 influent line on December 4 The samples were collected <br /> in tedlax bags and delivered to Sequoia Analytical for analysis of TPH-g,and BTEX concentrations <br /> The results, reported in milligrams per cubic meter, are shown in Appendix B <br /> PID readings at the exhaust port ranged between 0 and 15 ppm during the quarter Effluent readings <br /> did not follow upward or downward trends in inlet concentrations PID readings from VE-1 "deep" <br /> ranged from 0 to 40 ppm, but readings from VE-2 were consistently above 2,000 ppm PID <br /> readings from VE-1 "shallow"ranged from 440 to 800 ppm and averaged 637 ppm After the new - <br /> extraction well was installed on November 17, readings were also collected at the combined flow <br /> inlet port, as they had been earlier in the year These readings ranged between the deep and shallow <br /> well readings, averaging 1250 ppm <br /> 3 <br />