My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011208
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
2050
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543791
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2018 4:06:11 AM
Creation date
9/28/2018 4:18:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0011208
FileName_PostFix
XR0011208
RECORD_ID
PR0543791
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0003592
FACILITY_NAME
Aries Tek, LLC
STREET_NUMBER
2050
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
St
City
Stockton
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2050 E Fremont St
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
be decreased to bi-weekly Data from the fourth quarter, including the laboratory analysis of the sample <br /> collected in December, indicate that hydrocarbon concentrations have continued to decrease gradually <br /> However, the San Joaquin Valley Air Quality Pollution Control Distnct'has denied Apache's request to <br /> redu&the frequency of monitoring Hence, Upgradient will continue to monitor on a weekly basis <br /> during 1996 <br /> Upgradient also recommended that vapor samples be collected from both extraction wells in the fourth <br /> quarter in order to quantitatively measure the effect of the system at both deep and shallow depths <br />' However, because of the presence of water in the deep well and recent efforts by Apache personnel to <br /> inject fresh air into this well, the deep and shallow wells were not sampled separately in December <br /> Laboratory analysis of the vapor sample collected in December did not confirm the suggestion by VR <br />' Systems that poor engine performance in the third and early fourth quarters of 1995 was due to an <br /> elevated CO2 concentration in the subsurface Rather, the combustion unit may have been affected by <br /> an abnormally high N2 concentration <br /> Based on both field and laboratory results, Upgradient believes that the vapor extraction unit may be <br /> nearing its effective limit, and supplementary fuel costs may begin to make this methodology less cost- <br /> effective than other methods during 1996 Furthermore, because hydrocarbon concentrations in vapor <br /> samples commonly exceed those measured in soil samples by a few hundred parts per million, it is <br /> likely that remediation is nearing completion Therefore, Upgradient recommends that soil samples be <br /> ' collected before the end of the first quarter of 199610 determine the actual concentrations in soil <br /> Contaminated groundwater was sampled only in MW-5, and concentrations continued to decrease <br /> since their high in June No contaminants were detected in wells MW-2, MW-3, MW4, MW-6, or <br /> MW-7 during any of the four monitoring events in 1995 Therefore, Upgradient recommends that <br /> ' sampling of these wells be reduced to annually, with the next sampling in_June 1996 The deep <br /> extraction well and MW-5 should be sampled quarterly, unless water is not present <br /> 1 <br /> i <br /> 1 <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.