Laserfiche WebLink
To be presented at 1999 Petroleum Hydrocarbons Conference, Houston, Texas <br />the last two sample times. No significant loss of hexane or MTBE was noted in the sterile controls. In the <br />isopentane systems (Figure 4), no significant degradation was noted in the contaminated systems. Rapid <br />degradation of both isopentane and MTBE was observed in the background systems. Isopentane was <br />completely mineralized between day 1 and 12, and MTBE was not detected after day 12. Cyclohexane was <br />degraded very slowly in the contaminated soils, but no cometabolic degradation of MTBE was detectable <br />(Figure 5). Cyclohexane was also slowly degraded in the background sediments, and some MTBE <br />9000 <br />8000 <br />7000 <br />6000 <br />n <br />5000 <br />4000 <br />G <br />3000 <br />2000 <br />1000 <br />0 <br />cyclohexane - MtBE systems <br />- �- - cyclohexane - bg _ 0 MtBE - bg <br />cyclohexane - con El-_ MtBE - con <br />*- _ cyclohexane - sc _ *-_ MtBE - sc <br />10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 <br />elapsed time (days) <br />Figure 5. Concentration history of cyclohexane and MTBE in sacrificed batch microcosms. <br />bg = background sediments, con = contaminated sediments, sc = sterilized controls. <br />cometabolism may be occurring but the decrease in concentration is not significantly different from the sterile <br />controls to make a strong argument. It is possible that the slow rate of cyclohexane degradation did not result in <br />sufficient biomass growth to allow cometabolism or that the appropriate enzyme was not expressed. In either <br />case, cyclohexane does not appear to be a good primary substrate candidate for cometabolism in the VAFB <br />sediments. <br />Enumeration and Growth Studies <br />After completion of these batch tests, the last set of vials from the contaminated soil systems demonstrating <br />bioactivity were sent to North Carolina State University (NCSU) for further examination. The aim was to <br />determine the numbers of microorganisms in the microcosms and whether differences in these numbers could <br />account for the variations in cometabolic activity observed in the microcosm samples. The bacterial numbers <br />were established using conventional serial dilution and spread plate techniques. Samples (-5 g) of microcosm <br />sediment was mixed with sterile mineral salts medium (10 mL) in sterile plastic tubes (50 mL). The tubes were <br />shaken and then briefly (3 x 15 s) immersed in an ultrasonic water bath. The microcosm sediment was then <br />allowed to settle and samples (100 pL) of the supernatant were then transferred into sterile plastic tubes <br />containing mineral salts medium. The samples were then serially diluted to a final dilution of 104. Samples of <br />each dilution (100 pL) were spread on mineral salts agar plates and incubated in black plastic paint pots (5 L). <br />The pots contained a small conical flask (100 mL) in which pure hydrocarbon growth substrates (n -hexane or <br />iso -pentane) were added. The plates were incubated in the pots for 8 days at room temperature. The colony <br />forming units (cfus) were then visually scored and counted. Three separate serial dilutions were made for each <br />microcosm sample and three spread plates were generated for each sample. The microbial numbers reported <br />below represent average values obtained from plates containing between 30-300 clearly resolvable microbial <br />Page 7 <br />4-1 <br />- �- - cyclohexane - bg _ 0 MtBE - bg <br />cyclohexane - con El-_ MtBE - con <br />*- _ cyclohexane - sc _ *-_ MtBE - sc <br />10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 <br />elapsed time (days) <br />Figure 5. Concentration history of cyclohexane and MTBE in sacrificed batch microcosms. <br />bg = background sediments, con = contaminated sediments, sc = sterilized controls. <br />cometabolism may be occurring but the decrease in concentration is not significantly different from the sterile <br />controls to make a strong argument. It is possible that the slow rate of cyclohexane degradation did not result in <br />sufficient biomass growth to allow cometabolism or that the appropriate enzyme was not expressed. In either <br />case, cyclohexane does not appear to be a good primary substrate candidate for cometabolism in the VAFB <br />sediments. <br />Enumeration and Growth Studies <br />After completion of these batch tests, the last set of vials from the contaminated soil systems demonstrating <br />bioactivity were sent to North Carolina State University (NCSU) for further examination. The aim was to <br />determine the numbers of microorganisms in the microcosms and whether differences in these numbers could <br />account for the variations in cometabolic activity observed in the microcosm samples. The bacterial numbers <br />were established using conventional serial dilution and spread plate techniques. Samples (-5 g) of microcosm <br />sediment was mixed with sterile mineral salts medium (10 mL) in sterile plastic tubes (50 mL). The tubes were <br />shaken and then briefly (3 x 15 s) immersed in an ultrasonic water bath. The microcosm sediment was then <br />allowed to settle and samples (100 pL) of the supernatant were then transferred into sterile plastic tubes <br />containing mineral salts medium. The samples were then serially diluted to a final dilution of 104. Samples of <br />each dilution (100 pL) were spread on mineral salts agar plates and incubated in black plastic paint pots (5 L). <br />The pots contained a small conical flask (100 mL) in which pure hydrocarbon growth substrates (n -hexane or <br />iso -pentane) were added. The plates were incubated in the pots for 8 days at room temperature. The colony <br />forming units (cfus) were then visually scored and counted. Three separate serial dilutions were made for each <br />microcosm sample and three spread plates were generated for each sample. The microbial numbers reported <br />below represent average values obtained from plates containing between 30-300 clearly resolvable microbial <br />Page 7 <br />