Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />TABLE 6 <br />SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM EMISSION DATA <br />Former Chevron Service Station #9-5775 <br />301 West Kettleman Lane <br />Lodi, California <br />Sample Date <br />ID Sampled <br />Hour Meter <br />Reading <br />(hours) Nates <br />TPH as Gasoline <br />Effluent Effluent <br />Blower Average Concert- Emission Destruction Concen- <br />Vacuum Flow Rate tration Rate Efficiency tration <br />("H2O) (scfm) (ppmv) (lbs/day) (percent) (ppmv) <br />Benzene <br />Emission <br />Rate <br />(lbs/day) <br />Destruction <br />Efficiency <br />(percent) <br />EFFL 01/31/02 <br />13,297 <br />40 <br />103.31 <br />-- <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />-- <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 02/06/02 <br />13,439 <br />40 <br />98.20 <br /><5.0 <br />0.1 <br />100.00/c <br /><0.20 <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 02/13/02 <br />13,807 <br />40 <br />102.71 <br />-- <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />-- <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 03/06/02 <br />14,112 <br />40 <br />108.02 <br /><5A <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br /><0.20 <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 03/13/02 <br />14,280 <br />40 <br />108.02 <br />-- <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />-- <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 03/20/02 <br />14,448 <br />40 <br />108.02 <br /><5.0 <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br /><0.050 <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 04/03/02 <br />14,788 <br />40 <br />-- <br />-- <br />0.0 <br />100.0% <br />-- <br />0.000 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 04/09/02 <br />14,930 <br />40 <br />103.11 <br />-- <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 04/19/02 <br />15,168 <br />40 <br />103.11 <br />-- <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 04/23/02 <br />15,263 <br />40 <br />98.20 <br />-- <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 04/30/02 <br />15,431 <br />40 <br />98.20 <br /><5.0 <br />0.1 <br />100.0%'0 <br /><0.050 <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 05/07/02 <br />15,559 <br />40 <br />98.20 <br />-- <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />-- <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 05/14/02 <br />15,766 <br />40 <br />103.11 <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 05/21/02 <br />15,934 <br />40 <br />98.20 <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 05/29/02 <br />16,127 <br />40 <br />103.11 <br /><5.0 <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br /><0.050 <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 06/04/02 <br />16,271 <br />40 <br />I08.02 <br />-- <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />-- <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 06/11/02 <br />16,439 <br />40 <br />103.21 <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 06/18/02 <br />16,609 <br />40 <br />108.02 <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 06/25/02 <br />16,775 <br />40 <br />108.02 <br /><5.0 <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br /><0.050 <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 07/02/02 <br />16,943 <br />40 <br />108.02 <br />-- <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />-- <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 07/16/02 <br />17,276 <br />40 <br />106.02 <br /><5.0 <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br /><0.050 <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 07/30/02 <br />17,358 <br />40 <br />108.21 <br />-- <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />-- <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 08/13/02 <br />17,949 <br />40 <br />103.11 <br /><5.0 <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br /><0.050 <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 08/28/02 <br />18,309 <br />40 <br />103.11 <br />-- <br />0.I <br />100.0% <br />-- <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 09/12/02 <br />19,671 <br />40 <br />98.20 <br /><5.0 <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br /><0.050 <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />EFFL 09/24/02 <br />19,960 <br />40 <br />88.10 <br />0.1 <br />100.0% <br />-- <br />0.001 <br />100.0% <br />Explanations: <br />scfm = Standard cubic feet per minute <br />ppmv = Parts per million <br />by volume <br />lbs = Pounds <br />TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons <br />"H2O = Inches of Water <br />= Not measured <br />Nates: <br />a. Data for 7/10/00 appears to be the result of laboratory error. Does not match <br />previous or subsequent <br />analytical data. <br />b. Influent sample for 7/26M could not be analyzed for TPHg or BTEX <br />c. Data prior to l 1 /1/00 was reported by Gettler-Ryan Inc. <br />SVE O&M Tables -As <br />202 <br />