Laserfiche WebLink
1.0 INTRODUCTION <br />Section 311(j)(1)(C) of the Clean Water Act required that regulations be <br />issued to establish procedures, methods, equipment, and other <br />requirements to prevent discharges of oil from vessels and facilities and to <br />tiO6 contain such discharges from entering "navigable waters of the United <br />States or adjoining shorelines, or into or upon the waters of the contiguous <br />zone, or in Lands Act or he Deepwater Po t activitiesnnection with under <br />of 974, or that may affect natural <br />resources belonging to, appertaining to, or under the exclusive <br />management authority of the United States (including resources under the <br />Magnuson Fishery Conservation and Management Act)." These <br />regulations were promulgated by the United States Environmental <br />Protection Agency (EPA) and are found in 40 CFR Part 112, Oil Pollution <br />Prevention. <br />One of the requirements of these regulations is that certain containment <br />areas be "sufficiently impervious" to prevent a spill from reaching <br />navigable waters. Specifically, the regulations in 40 CFR 112 require <br />secondary containment systems, "including walls and floor, must be <br />capable of containing oil and must be constructed so that any discharge <br />from a primary containment system, such as a tank, will not escape the <br />containment system before cleanup occurs." (40 CFR 112.7(c)) With <br />regard to bulk storage containers, the regulations similarly require that <br />"diked areas are sufficiently impervious to contain discharged oil" <br />according to 40 CFR 112.8(c)(2). However, the regulations are silent as to <br />what constitutes "sufficiently impervious." <br />At one time, U.S. EPA proposed a 72 -hour impermeability standard for <br />containment. This proposal ultimately was withdrawn. In the preamble <br />to the July 17, 2002 regulations, U.S. EPA stated: <br />"... we have decided to withdraw the proposal for the 72 -hour <br />impermeability standard and retain the current standard that diked <br />areas must be sufficiently impervious to contain oil... the purpose <br />of secondary containment is to contain oil from reaching waters of <br />the United States. The rationale for the 72 -hour standard was to <br />allow time for the discovery and removal of an oil spill. We believe <br />that an owner or operator of a facility should have flexibility in <br />how to prevent discharges ... and that any method of containment <br />that achieves that end is sufficient." <br />ERM 1-1 110870\CHEVRON\SPCC -JULY 2010 <br />