Laserfiche WebLink
MICDAEL COLLINS Condenseitf4L �, JUNE 2, 1994 <br /> - Page 21 Page 23 <br /> 1 Q. Okay. Do you know where that would have 1 Q. Okay. If you would,why don't you put a <br /> 2 been on this map? 2 one two and a three on each the respective tanks there? <br /> 3 A. It's not apparent from this map. I might be 3 <'"A. Okay. <br /> 4 able to find it in the file somewhere else but it's not 4 Q. Okay. I think you indicated that Tank One <br /> I 5 apparent from this diagram. 5 is the one that had 1300 parts per million on the <br /> 6 Q. Okay. That's all right. 6 f4teea feet? <br /> 7 And apparently the auras where there is 7 A. I.will have to go back and look at that. <br /> 8 contamination noted by Mr.Trevena that day--it looks 8 Could you repeat that? <br /> 9 like about the middle of the page. Could you read that 9 Q. Tank One,as you have marked it now was the <br /> 10 for me,please? 10 one that bad the 1300 parts per million of TPHg? <br /> iP <br /> 11 A. A-14 T-2W. 11 -A. That's correct. <br /> 12 Q. What does that mean? 12 Q. On the west side? <br /> 13 A. That is an arbitrary designation for a 13 'A. That's correct. <br /> 14 sample,and I'm assuming--I could guess, ifyou'd like 14 <br /> Q. Okay. And Tank Two had 600 parts per <br /> 15 but I don't know. 15 million TPHg. Was that on the west side as well? <br /> ti <br /> 16 Q. No. It's a different designation than you 16 A. That's correct,yes. .� <br /> 17 use yourself, for example? 17 3Q, And Tank Three had just some minor <br /> 18 A. Yes. 18 contamination? <br /> I9L <br /> Q. But apparently I guess that's what 19 'A. That's correct. <br /> i 20 Mr. Trevena called that soil sample? 20 Q. This may be more of a question of curiosity, <br /> I 21 A. That's correct. 21 but on Mr.Trevena's notes he indicates no soil <br /> 14 22 Q. Okay. Taken at fourteen feet? 22 discoloration on any of the four samples taken from <br /> .s <br /> 23 A. That's correct. 23 Tanks One and Two,which.apparently tarred out they have <br /> 24 Q. No soil discoloration at that particular 24 significant levels of TPHg. Tank Three he notes soil <br /> 25 location? 25 discoloration at both soil sample locations,although <br /> Page 22 Page 24 <br /> 1 A. That's correct. i that turned out to have only minor contamination. Do <br /> 2 Q. And the one directly below it apparently 2YOU mean that it does not necessarily have some <br /> �o <br /> 3 indicates that there was soil discoloration at that 3 consistency between soil discoloration and whether or <br /> 4 time? 4 not�therc is actual contamination or significant levels <br /> 5 A. That's correct. 5 of contamination? <br /> 6 Q. That would indicate that there is some type 6 i MR PAPAS; Okay. You are talking in <br /> 7 of discoloration caused by contamination? 7 general,not just in reference to that? <br /> a A. That's correct. That would indicate that he 8 3 MR.HASTINGS: Q.Yes,just in <br /> 9 sees soil discoloration. 9 general. To me it seems odd that the one tank that you <br /> I0 Q. Okay. Do you know if that was one of the 10 thought had minor contamination was the only one he <br /> 11 sites that you mentioned of the sample that showed the 11 noted soil discoloration. <br /> 12 contamination? 12 A. Do I find it unusual? I would say,yes,I <br /> 13 mR.PAPAS: when you say"that"— 13 find it unusual but not impossible. It happens. <br /> 14 nix.HAsTiNGs: rm sorry. The lower 14 Q. Okay. So unusual but not necessarily of any <br /> 15 left-hand—the sample was apparently taken at the 15 significance? <br /> 16 lower left-hand--I am not describing this very well. 16 'A. Right. <br /> is <br /> 17 These tanks aren't marked Number One,Number 17 Q. Okay. And apparently sometime around <br /> 18 Two and Number Thrix,as the descriptions that18 had ou �} <br /> y September 12th that--if I am guessing the 30-day <br /> 19 given me. Do you know which ones would be One,Two and 19 period of the notice to the public regarding public <br /> 20 Three on here based on the soil sample analysis that you 20 participation expired? <br /> 21 gave us earlier? 21 A. The over-excavation of the soil was <br /> 22 A, Yes. You can tell by his designation of the 22 scheduled for September the 28th. That was done on <br /> 23 sample,this top one is called S-14 T-1,so that is Tank.' 23 September the 15th at the end of the public <br /> 4 <br /> 24 One. The second one is A-14 T-2 so that is Tank Two. 24 participation. <br /> 25 The third one is S-14-T3. So that is Tank Three. J25 Q. I'm sorry. Originally scheduled for <br /> PORTALE & ASSOCIATES DEPOSITION REPORTERS Page 21 - Page 24 <br /> a� <br />