Laserfiche WebLink
U 14 <br /> 1 site, "you" being Mr . Collins? <br /> r <br /> L 2 A . I was given the results of the sampling <br /> �k <br /> 3 beneath the tanks on 8-7-92 . . <br /> i; <br /> 4 Q . When had the tanks been removed? <br /> S A . They were removed on 6--19-92 . <br /> 6 Q . So I would take it, Itthen, on 6-19, <br /> 7 Mr . Trevena noted that will there had been some <br /> 8 contamination and some samples Were taken on that day? <br /> 9 A . That ' s correct . <br /> E 10 Q . Now do you know whyi�it would be about a <br /> 11 month and a half a month and three weeks later that you <br /> -12 would receive the file or receive contact? <br /> ii <br /> 13 ISR . PAPAS : Well, I 'm objecting to the <br /> I# <br /> 14 extent that it calls for speculation . <br /> I 15 You can answer it, if you know . <br /> jb <br /> 16 THE WITNESS : I don ' t know . <br /> p <br /> 17 NMR . HASTINGS : 'ItQ . Is that a typical <br /> iE 18 time? <br /> 19 A . I would say it ' s pretty routine that we <br /> if <br /> 20 usually get a work plan . Actually, :it was received on <br /> I4 21 that date, 8-7-92 . A work plani�was received by me which <br /> 22 had the results of the samplindand it also stated a <br /> i� <br /> 23 scope of work which they intended to do to excavate the <br /> I�, <br /> I� <br /> 24 soil beneath the tanks . So that length of time to me is <br /> a <br /> 25 not surprising . <br /> .i <br /> �l <br /> i} <br /> it <br /> PORTALE & ASSOCIATES 8209 ) 462-3377 <br /> t <br /> I� <br />