Laserfiche WebLink
29 <br /> ij <br /> 1 when you knew there was no contamination to 40 feet from <br /> U(!i 2 the five boring samples --- I ' m sorry, from the five <br /> 3 borings? <br /> 4 A . I knew that we had circumscribed the problem <br /> 5 itself . After the borings aredrilled and the augers <br /> { 6 are removed, the holes, which, like I said, are <br /> 7 approximately 40 feet deep are backfilled with cement . <br /> 8 Q . Concrete? <br /> 9 A . Concrete . And I have some pictures of the <br /> 10 excavation and some of the cement . <br /> Irs <br /> 11 Q . Do you know when those photos were taken? <br /> ' -12 A . They were taken thel� day of the second time <br /> 13 we went out for excavation, which I don ' t think we ' ve <br /> 14 gotten to that point yet . <br /> 15 Q . In our discussion, you mean? <br /> 16 A . Yes . <br /> 17 Q . Big hole . <br /> 18 Okay . After you made the borings then and <br /> 19 those samples turned out to have nondetectable amounts <br /> 20 of contamination, did Quorum or,}' somebody else on behalf <br /> 21 of the owners submit an additional addendum to the work <br /> 22 plan? <br /> 23 A . The report came in for the borings that <br /> 24 stated they were nondetect on November 6th, 1992 . <br /> C/ I 25 Q . Do you know when the borings were done? <br /> # PORTALE & ASSOCIATESI (209 ) 462-3377 <br /> i <br />