Laserfiche WebLink
—]i' 3 9 <br /> 4" <br /> '1 A . That ' s correct . ib <br /> 2 Q , Had the hole been filled by then? <br /> 4 <br /> { 3 A . December 28th, the hole was not filled . <br /> 4 Q . Do you know why not?{ <br /> P <br /> a <br /> 5 MR . PAPAS : I ' ll object to the extent <br /> 6 it calls for speculation . 1 <br /> 7 You can answer, if you have knowledge of <br /> 8 that , 0 <br /> 9 THE WITNESS : Cion I -- my last answer, <br /> i� <br /> 10 can I research that a little bit? I said it was not <br /> 3 <br /> 11 filled on the 28th , Let ' s see , l The pit was backfilled <br /> .ij <br /> 12 on the 29th when I inspected it 'i The pit had been <br /> 13 backfilled on the 29th . <br /> 14 MR . HASTINGS : Q , Okay . <br /> w <br /> 15 A . When the backfill occurred, I ' m not sure at <br /> 16 this point . I can research it further , <br /> 17 Q . Okay . At least as of December 28th, the <br /> 18 contaminated soil that had been removed from the pit 'or <br /> 19 excavated, I guess is the right word, had not been <br /> 20 removed from the site; is that correct? <br /> I <br /> 21 A . That ' s correct . 11 <br /> 22 Q . Had there been any soil samples done on the <br /> 23 excavated soil? <br /> 24 MR . PAPAS : At �,iany time or during that <br /> 25 time? <br /> PORTALS & ASSOCIATES ( 209 ) 452-3377 <br />