Laserfiche WebLink
I L". 41 <br /> 1 our regulation because it is contaminated . <br /> 2 Q . Okay . So could the have removed it to a <br /> 3 different site owned by Save-Mor? <br /> 4 A . Yes . <br /> l <br /> 5 Q . So I guess the limitation is putting it on <br /> i' <br /> 6 somebody else' s property? <br /> I� <br /> i <br /> 7 A . Correct . It could also have been removed to <br /> 8 a landfill after they had properly characterized it with <br /> X10 <br /> 9 chemical analysis , <br /> 10 Q . So I guess that actually could have been <br /> } <br /> 11 done during the excavation period itself? <br /> 12 A . That ' s correct . <br /> i <br /> i' <br /> t 13 Q . Has anybody else told you why that was not <br /> 14 done? <br /> 15 MR . PAPAS : You mean during the <br /> 16 excavation? <br /> 17 MR . HASTINGS : � Q . Let me ask you this : <br /> 18 Do you know whether the soil has been removed as of <br /> 3 <br /> 19 today? �€ <br /> 20 A . Yes, I know whetherit ' s been removed . <br /> t <br /> 21 Q . Okay . What do you know about that? <br /> 22 A . It ' s still behind the store or the side of <br /> 11 <br /> 23 the store behind a fence . It ' s 'no longer contaminated . <br /> I � <br /> 24 Q . How do you know that? <br /> 25 A . we ' ve sampled it . We ' ve overseen the <br /> i!. <br /> PORTALE & ASSOCIATES (204 ) 462-3377 <br />