Laserfiche WebLink
!' U 45 <br /> .j <br /># , w 1 property prior to -- well, if it had been removed prior <br /> 2 to or at the time that the holeyhad been cleaned, which <br /> f <br /> i <br /> 3 apparently was December 8th, 1992, is when you notified <br /> l <br /> 4 SHN they could fill the hole? !' <br /> E ! <br /> 5 A . December 8th, 19924 correct . <br /> i <br /> 6 Q . If the soil, contaminated soil had been <br /> 7 removed to a different Save—Mor site or to an acceptable <br /> a <br /> 8 landfill prior to that date, when would the closure -- <br /> 9 when would the County ' s closureletterhave been issued? <br /> 10 A . If the soil was removed to a landfill, the <br /> a � <br /> 11 landfill accepts responsibility for the soil . A closure <br /> .12 letter could have been mailed at that point . If the <br /> 13 soil was removed to an-other area, property of Save—Mor i <br /> 1i <br /> + 14 or Mr . Mozeb, we could not issu11 e a closure letter until <br /> s <br /> 15 the soil was clean or a landfil, or whatever . <br /> 16 Q . Okay . So the site,I <br /> then, when you are <br /> 17 speaking about a site closure letter, it ' s not only <br /> 18 talking about the location but also the contaminated <br /> 19 soil that may be removed or relocated to a different <br /> 3 <br /> 20 location? <br /> 21 A . Could you repeat that? <br /> 22 Q . In the site closure(, letter, the site that <br /> i <br /> 23 you are referring to is not onljy the actual physical <br /> 24 location of where the contamination had been but also <br /> F 25 the contaminated soil that hadlbeen excavated . So even <br /> { t <br /> PORTALE &, ASSOCIATESj'r ( 209 ) 462-3377 <br />