My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AD ART
>
3133
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543365
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2018 2:24:57 PM
Creation date
10/22/2018 1:53:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0543365
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003512
FACILITY_NAME
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES
STREET_NUMBER
3133
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
AD ART
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
08710073
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3133 N AD ART RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 May 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 98-0460 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> 479 ppm (10 feet bsg). Organic vapor was detected in two of the six samples collected from probing <br /> B2 at a concentration of 1 ppb. Organic vapor was not detected in samples collected from boring B3. <br /> 3.2. ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SAMPLES <br /> TPH-g, TPH-d and TPH-mo were detected in soil collected at 10 feet bsg (sample B1-10) at <br /> concentrations of 1,800 parts per million (ppm, reported as mg/kg), 3,800 ppm and 2,300 ppm, <br /> respectively. Ethylbenzene and xylenes were detected in sample BI-10 at concentrations of 1.0 ppm <br /> and 3.2 ppm, respectively. Other petroleum hydrocarbon compounds were not detected in soil <br /> samples collected at the site,including the sample collected five feet below sample B1-10 (B1-15). <br /> Fuel oxygenates were not detected in the six soil samples analyzed from the site. <br /> Analytical results of soil samples are summarized on Table 1. The laboratory report(AAL Order No. <br /> A00041219) and chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix B. <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> 4. <br /> Based upon data collected from the site, AGE concludes the following: <br /> `� • Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in the sample collected from a depth of 10 feet in <br /> probing B I. Hydrocarbons were not detected in the remaining samples analyzed from the <br /> site. <br /> • The vertical extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil appears to be limited to less than 15 feet <br /> below the former dispenser location. The lateral extent of impacted soil toward the west and <br /> east is limited by probings P2 and P3. <br /> • Primarily fine-grained soils were encountered at the site to the total depth explored. The <br /> ... lower permeability of these soils would retard the migrations of contaminants in soil from <br /> reaching ground water. <br /> The area over and around the former dispenser Iocation is paved with concrete and asphalt, <br /> limiting infiltration of ground water. <br /> 5.0. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Due to the limited lateral and vertical extent of impacted soil beneath the former dispenser location, <br /> `� the depth to ground water and the fine-grained nature of the soil beneath the site, AGE recommends <br /> no further action be required for the former UST and dispenser locations. <br /> Adratrred CeuEriN-irvrnnental,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.