Laserfiche WebLink
KLFIL 11141 iUN uKUur ILL ICU .53U O�� f00( HPV Lf i�ID 14 - if r .vz: <br /> THE REMEDIATION GROUP, enc. <br /> f nviionmenld Nonogement cnd Engineering Consullonts ---_.__.__...__...____.._..............__.._.....,.._......_ <br /> 70W Bstaam Wsy,Sidle 100 CW ttnd,C&II%nla M11 Tzek; n t 51 71378 Fax 510-BW71137 <br /> April 27, 1995 <br /> Project 1002.03-01 <br /> Mary Meays <br /> Senior R.E.H.S. <br /> Public Health Services, San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental}iealth Division <br /> 445 N San Joaquin Street <br /> P.U. Dox 399 <br /> Stockton, California.95201-0388 <br /> Subject: Transmittal of Additional Closure Documentation <br /> 4110 Industrial Way <br /> Tracy, California & <br /> Dear Ms. Meays: GO <br /> As you requested, an additional table(Table 4), preserving the results of the soil stockpile <br /> sampling;perforined during tank removal,activities at 4110 industrial Way in Tracy, California in <br /> 1992, is enclosed. This table and a revised page 4 of our December 6, 1994 site closure resort- <br /> where the words "71w analytical results for the soil stockpile sampling conduclud during[lie tank <br /> removal activities are tabulated on Table 4."have bccn addod -are enclosed. Man insert this <br /> table and replace page 4 in your copy of the closure report. This information has been proviOusly <br /> presented to the San Joaquin County Enviromnental Health Division(County)in reports prepared <br /> in 1992 and it was discussed during our meeting on April 12, 1995. <br /> You have stated thatyou final the December 6, 1994 closure report"incomplete" because it <br /> "continually refers to previous reports". Apart from our obvious beliefs about how appropriate or <br /> inappropriate it is to refer to these earlier reports,it should be clear that only one owlier report is <br /> specifically referred to; and, it is rgrroduced and attached to the closure report and its results are <br /> very clearly and concisely summarized on gage two of the closum report. Accordingly, we submit <br /> that the closure report is comprehensive and complete. <br /> We continue to petition the County for adnunistrative closure, We have demonstrated,through <br /> groundwater sampling conducted over four successive calendar quarters, tinder the auspices of <br /> the County, that no detectable contamination remains at this site. We have provkk-A 1.11e County <br /> with reports documenting the results of'our site activities. We have summarized all previous <br /> reports in a closure report, prepared in accordance with a County requested formal: and, for the <br /> convenience of County stall,we presented all our findings in our meeting on April l x, 1995. As <br /> we understand it, the intent of the closure report "it,to provide a document upon which the <br /> regulator may make an objective decision regarding the requested closure" (CVRWQCB, <br />