My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
2651
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543371
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2018 3:20:25 PM
Creation date
10/23/2018 11:39:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0543371
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006174
FACILITY_NAME
Best Express Foods Inc.
STREET_NUMBER
2651
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16912003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2651 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
455
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vicki McCartney [EH] <br />From: Jim Barton Obarton@waterboards.ca.gov] <br />Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 201116:29 AM <br />To: John (PSC) Carrow <br />Cc: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br />Subject: RE: SL Airport Way SJCEHD Case Number: 19093 <br />Attachments: Earthgrains ISCO Pilot Monitoring Reporting Program JB).doc; NOI a.pdf <br />-_« <br />Earthgrains ISCO NOI a.pdf (95 KB) <br />Pilot Monitor... <br />Hi John, <br />The attached NOI only lists parcel #165-040-13, not the others listed below. I will need <br />a corrected NOI mailed to me. Also, please correct the CEQA section with the following <br />additions: <br />Type of CEQA: Mitigated Negative Declaration Date of CEQA: 14 July 2008 <br />I have already restored Table 2 to its former list of constituents (see attached revised <br />draft MRP). Please review the attached MRP and in your reply, provide concurrence to the <br />entire document. Upon my receipt of the concurrence, you may begin the pilot study after <br />receiving the County's approval. The data from the pilot study will be used to determine <br />if a permit is needed for full scale implementation'. If a permit is needed, then the fee <br />will be submitted and a letter (Notice of Applicability) will be issued by this office. <br />Thanks. <br />Jim Barton <br />James L.L. Barton, P.G. <br />Engineering Geologist <br />California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region, 11020 Sun Center <br />Drive, Suite 200, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 office (916) 464-4615 <br />fax (916) 464-4704 <br />>>> "Carrow, John (PSC)" <JCarrow@pscnow.com> 6/6/2011 5:14 PM >>> <br />Jim, <br />Thanks for the review. I am out in the field all week so I won't have access to all of my <br />files. I will try to answer your questions in the three e-mails with this one reply. <br />The entire property consist of assessor parcel numbers are 169-12-001, 169-12-002, <br />169-12-003, 169-12-004, and 169-12-005. The study will take place in 169-12-002 and <br />169-12-003. I thought that I placed all of them in the NOI. It may be a form thing that <br />needs to be hand written. <br />If it will save you time we can place the.Cr 6+, etc. from the original tables if this is <br />a requirement for Modified Fentons reagent. <br />I realize SJC LOP will have to approve.the final work plan, I included the draft it so <br />that you could evaluate the MRP. <br />Please let me know if you have additional questions, <br />Thanks again <br />John R. Carrow, PG <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.