My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
2651
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543371
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2018 3:20:25 PM
Creation date
10/23/2018 11:39:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0543371
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006174
FACILITY_NAME
Best Express Foods Inc.
STREET_NUMBER
2651
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16912003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2651 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
455
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
S <br />Page '1 of 2 <br />Vicki McCartney [EH] <br />From: Anderson, Paul (PSC) [PAnderson@pscnow.com] <br />Sent:. Wednesday, November 18, 2009 10:17 AM <br />To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br />Subject: RE: GEO_REPORT Submittal #8721551358: T0607700044 Has Been Denied <br />Attachments: Table 4 - Historical GW Grab Ana!ytical Data .pdf; Feasibility Study, Remedial Evaluation & <br />Request for Closure Section 5.1.pdf <br />Good morning Vicki. <br />I have reviewed the "...Report (Part 1 of 2)" GeoTracker denial reasons as listed below on your <br />automatic reply. <br />Upon review, both denial reasons were corrected and the report was revised. <br />I have just uploaded the revision of "Feasibility Study, Remedial Evaluation & Request for <br />Closure (Part 1 of 2) REV" into GeoTracker: <br />In summary: <br />Denial Reason #1 in which the analytical data for several of the CPT groundwater grab <br />samples was missing from Table 4 was due to delegating someone else to assemble the <br />table. The person inserted an older version of the table instead of the current version listing <br />the missing analyses. Of course, I should have caught it. I have replaced the table in the <br />revised report. As well,1 attached a PDF copy of Table 4 to this email in case it would be <br />beneficial to you. <br />Denial Reason #2 in which the text in Section 5.1 listed well SVE-1 as having been installed <br />on-site, but no information documented this well was due to a simple typo by John Carrow. He <br />wanted to list all .the wells and simply didn't realize:that there is no SVE-1 or simply typed the <br />name out of habit since several other project sites have a well by this name. I should have <br />caught this too. I simply deleted the reference to well SVE-1 from the text in the revised report. <br />I attached a PDF copy of Section 5.1 to this email in case it would be beneficial to you. <br />Please feel free to reply with any additional questions <br />Thank you. <br />Paul Anderson <br />-----Original Message ----- <br />From: vmccartney@sjcehd.com [mailto:vmccartney@sjcehd.com] <br />Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 6:01 PM <br />To: Anderson, Paul (PSC) <br />Subject: GEO_REPORT Submittal #8721551358 : T0607700044 Has Been Denied <br />*** THIS EMAIL WAS AUTOMATICALLY GENERATED BECAUSE ONE OF YOUR <br />SUBMITTALS HAS BEEN DENIED *** <br />SUBMITTAL TYPE: GEO_REPORT <br />SUBMITTAL DATE: 10/7/2009 7:02:15 AM <br />11/18/2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.