My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
2651
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543371
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2018 3:20:25 PM
Creation date
10/23/2018 11:39:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0543371
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006174
FACILITY_NAME
Best Express Foods Inc.
STREET_NUMBER
2651
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16912003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2651 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
455
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
= Messrs Trommer and LNw6n <br />Preliminary Five -Year Review Letters <br />Various Sites <br />19 June 2008 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />chromium (CR;6) in a number of the monitoring wells; the CR" was not related to <br />the ozone injection of the pilot test. Approval for ORC has been put on hold <br />pending and evaluation of the effect of ORC injection on aquifer quality. At this <br />time a pilot test for SVE and insitu air sparging and a work plan to install a <br />sentinel well to protect a nearby down -gradient domestic well have been <br />approved. The EHD agrees with the general recommendation to implement <br />active remediation to achieve WQOs in a timely manner. <br />102 Wilson Way, S. <br />The CUF recommended that the EHD direct the RP to assess alternative <br />groundwater treatment technologies that might achieve WQOs more rapidly; the <br />EHD agrees with this recommendation, but points out that this directive has been <br />issued. The RP has also been under directive to evaluate and reactivate SVE if <br />appropriate; the SVE unit on site has not been utilized since circa 2002. <br />101 Wilson Way, S. <br />The CUF recommended that the EHD direct the RP to assess the effectiveness <br />of the current remediation systems and implement other technologies to achieve <br />WQOs in a timely manner. The EHD agrees with this recommendation. A work <br />plan to advance three soil borings to assess a source area and evaluate SVE <br />effectiveness has recently been approved by the EHD; borings encountering <br />significant soil contamination will be converted to SVE wells and plumbed into the <br />SVE system. <br />814 Charter Way, E. <br />The CUF has recommended site closure consideration. The EHD does agree <br />that this site is close to closure consideration; contaminant concentrations in <br />most monitoring wells have dropped to low or non-detectable concentrations with <br />the exception of monitoring well MW -108. Recent work has provided data to pass <br />the vapor intrusion evaluation and the ESL comparison. Recently grab water <br />samples have been collected to test the consultant's hypothesis that <br />contaminants have migrated from an adjacent site (most likely 749 E. Charter <br />Way) to impact MW -8. If the data supports the hypothesis the EHD will direct <br />submittal of a site closure report. <br />701 Charter Way, E <br />• The CUF agreed with the EHD directive to submit an interim remediation work <br />plan and continue plume delineation toward the southeast. An interim <br />remediation work plan is in preparation and is expected to be submitted within a <br />week. The EHD agrees with the CUF recommendation. <br />3931 Newton Road <br />The CUF agreed with the EHD directive to evaluate remedial technologies for the <br />site. <br />5 -Year Review Comment Letter 061908.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.