Laserfiche WebLink
= Messrs Trommer and LNw6n <br />Preliminary Five -Year Review Letters <br />Various Sites <br />19 June 2008 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />chromium (CR;6) in a number of the monitoring wells; the CR" was not related to <br />the ozone injection of the pilot test. Approval for ORC has been put on hold <br />pending and evaluation of the effect of ORC injection on aquifer quality. At this <br />time a pilot test for SVE and insitu air sparging and a work plan to install a <br />sentinel well to protect a nearby down -gradient domestic well have been <br />approved. The EHD agrees with the general recommendation to implement <br />active remediation to achieve WQOs in a timely manner. <br />102 Wilson Way, S. <br />The CUF recommended that the EHD direct the RP to assess alternative <br />groundwater treatment technologies that might achieve WQOs more rapidly; the <br />EHD agrees with this recommendation, but points out that this directive has been <br />issued. The RP has also been under directive to evaluate and reactivate SVE if <br />appropriate; the SVE unit on site has not been utilized since circa 2002. <br />101 Wilson Way, S. <br />The CUF recommended that the EHD direct the RP to assess the effectiveness <br />of the current remediation systems and implement other technologies to achieve <br />WQOs in a timely manner. The EHD agrees with this recommendation. A work <br />plan to advance three soil borings to assess a source area and evaluate SVE <br />effectiveness has recently been approved by the EHD; borings encountering <br />significant soil contamination will be converted to SVE wells and plumbed into the <br />SVE system. <br />814 Charter Way, E. <br />The CUF has recommended site closure consideration. The EHD does agree <br />that this site is close to closure consideration; contaminant concentrations in <br />most monitoring wells have dropped to low or non-detectable concentrations with <br />the exception of monitoring well MW -108. Recent work has provided data to pass <br />the vapor intrusion evaluation and the ESL comparison. Recently grab water <br />samples have been collected to test the consultant's hypothesis that <br />contaminants have migrated from an adjacent site (most likely 749 E. Charter <br />Way) to impact MW -8. If the data supports the hypothesis the EHD will direct <br />submittal of a site closure report. <br />701 Charter Way, E <br />• The CUF agreed with the EHD directive to submit an interim remediation work <br />plan and continue plume delineation toward the southeast. An interim <br />remediation work plan is in preparation and is expected to be submitted within a <br />week. The EHD agrees with the CUF recommendation. <br />3931 Newton Road <br />The CUF agreed with the EHD directive to evaluate remedial technologies for the <br />site. <br />5 -Year Review Comment Letter 061908.doc <br />