Laserfiche WebLink
2651 South Airport Way, Stockton, CA Page 2 of 6 <br />1� �J <br />Since none of the Geo _Well data from previous quarterly groundwater monitoring events has been <br />entered into GeoTracker, it is fine that you begin with the April 2006 Geo Well data and correctly enter the <br />data into GeoTracker. Then before uploading previous Geo _Well data to GeoTracker, please make the <br />corrections to the data and resubmit the hardcopy revisions to San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br />Department. Thank you, Paul. <br />Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br />San Joaquin County <br />Environmental Health Department <br />304 E. Weber Avenue <br />Stockton, CA 95202-2708 <br />Phone: (209) 468-3456 <br />Fax: (209) 468-3433 <br />E-mail: vmccartney@sjcehd.com <br />-----Original Message ----- <br />From: Anderson, Paul [mailto:PAnderson@pscnow.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 8:38 AM <br />To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br />Subject: RE: 2651 South Airport Way, Stockton, CA <br />Importance: High <br />Good morning Vicki. <br />While I was preparing the EDD for the GEO_WELL upload for the January event, I began to wonder <br />if the upload for the January event would cause some confusion. <br />Tom Neely and I re -measured well locations and reviewed installation records and reports and <br />discovered that locations PZ -2 and SP -1 have been presented incorrectly on the AutoCAD maps. <br />This occurred prior to my taking over the project from the onset of the two wells. <br />This explains the bizarre well depth differences between the two wells. <br />My initial assumption was that Kleinfelder was taking the total well depth measurements incorrectly <br />or was simply confusing the well locations. <br />However, upon further investigation, I discovered that the location of the actual installation for the <br />two wells were never incorporated into the AutoCAD base map. <br />As well, the two gasoline UST's were incorrectly located on the map. <br />With this recent revelation, the AutoCAD map has been revised. <br />The field samplers have been made aware of the correction for this week's sampling. <br />Now having stated that, I would like to enter the GEO_WELL data for the 2nd quarterly event taking <br />place this week (April 1 gth) as the first record. <br />My fear is that if I enter the January event it will be incorrect and confusing, especially now that the <br />reports have been submitted uploaded. <br />I would like to have a survey scheduled and knowing that the "Z" data will likely change based on <br />recent datum, incorporate the April event data into the GEO WELL report as the first record. <br />At least this way, from the April event forward, all data will be correct and consistent with regard to <br />location identifiers (well names) and current 7" datum. <br />Then upon the sump excavation and well vault repairs, I will need to resurvey that portion of the site <br />to incorporate the excavation and vault repairs. <br />Please let me know your recommendations so I can proceed promptly. <br />Paul Anderson <br />From: Vicki McCartney [EH] [mailto:vmccartney@sjcehd.com] <br />Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:32 AM <br />To: Anderson, Paul <br />4/18/2006 <br />