Laserfiche WebLink
_.. <br /> File No.2070-2 <br /> 19 December 1991 <br /> —\ page 9 <br /> -- 3.5 Well Pumping Test Results <br /> s A continuous, 24-hours well pumping test was conducted for the Rainbo Bakery site utilizing the <br /> existing onsite monitoring wells. MW-1, located in the center of the groundwater contaminant <br /> Plume, was utilized as the pumping well. MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-6 and MW-8 were utilized <br /> as observation wells. Drawdown of the local groundwater table was continuously measured and <br /> recorded in the pumping well and five observation wells during the well pumping test. <br /> I <br /> { During the well pumping test, MW-4 was the first observation well to be influenced by the pumped <br /> _ well at approximately 5 minutes after the start of the test. At approximately 330 minutes after the <br /> start of the test, all five observation wells were noted to be influenced by the pumped well. Since <br />�.. the groundwater contaminant plume extcads no farther than any of the five observation wells,the <br /> _ 6111 extent of the groundwater contaminant plume was accordingly contained within the zone of <br /> influence of the pumped well at approximately 330 minutes after the start of the well pumping test. <br /> } Continued pumping resulted in the local groundwater table lowering even further and the zoite of <br /> influence of the pumped well expanding farther out laterally. Figure 1 I illustrates the approximate . <br /> drawdown encountered in the pumping well and the observation wells at 330 minut_s, 750 minutes, <br /> 1020 minutes and 1320 minutes after the start of the well pumping test. <br /> At the pumping rate of 6.7 gpm, groundwater inflow to the pumped well was noted to <br /> approximately equal the rate of groundwater extraction at approximately 1200 minutes (10 hours) <br /> after the start of the test. At this point, d5awdown in the pumped well was approximately 10.36 <br /> feet. From the time of 1200 minutes until the end of the test, drawdown in the pumped well <br /> r fluctuated between 10.36 feet and I1.64 feet. <br /> A spreadsheet was created tabulating the field data obtained from the performance. of the well <br /> pumping test. Data incorporated in the spreadsheet included the, distance of each observation well <br /> from the pumped well,the drawdown in the pumped well,the drawdown in the observation wells, <br /> and the time at which the drawdown measurements were obtained. A copy of the spreadsheet is <br /> _ included in Appendix X. <br /> Distance-drawdown graphs for each of the five observation wells were created by plotting the data <br /> contained in 010 spreadsheet according to the Jacob Straight-Line Method (see C.W.Fetter, 1988 <br /> and Driscoll, 1986 for a detailed explanation of the Jacob Straight-Line Method). Aquifer <br /> transmissivity and storage coefficient were then extrapolated from the distance-drawdown graphs. <br /> The aquifer properties are utilized to predict the performance of groundwater extraction wells. <br /> Copies of the five distance-drawdown graphs are included in Appendix XI. <br /> Transmissivity is an aquifer property which reprzsents the quantity of water which can be <br /> transmitted through the aquifer. It is determined from the distance-drawdown graph based on the <br /> i slope of the drawdown line and the pump discharge rate. The five values obtained for the aquifer <br /> i transmissivity based on the pumping test data for the Rainbo Bakery site were 6551, 6206,5340, <br /> 6206 and 6936 gallons per day per foot of aquifer,thickness, The average value was calculated a; <br /> 6248 gallons per day per foot of aquifer thickness. <br /> Tha storage coefficient represents the volume of water stored in the aquifer which can be released <br /> ANDERSON <br /> ]C'71 CONSULTING <br /> GROUP <br />