Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Mr. Philip S. Isorena <br />November 19, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br />remediation to non -zero risk-based or health -based standards such as the drinking water <br />MCLS may be possible. <br />3. We plan to conduct at least two separate phases of extraction and treatment to a point <br />of 90% reduction of initial VOC concentrations for both soil vapor and groundwater. In <br />addition, if an achievable health -based standard is not agreed upon, then the approach to <br />closure will be to perform a feasibility study to show that cleanup has been accomplished <br />to the extent technically and economically feasible. Sufficient data will be collected <br />periodically during remediation to support the feasibility study. This study would will <br />consider the seven factors listed in the RWQCB letter and other criteria drawn from <br />regulatory guidance such as the Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Impracticability <br />of Ground -Water Remediation (USEPA 1993). <br />Responses to Additional Comments <br />1. A memorandum report of findings of short term pumping tests at the site was <br />completed and submitted on October 19. Parsons considers the information gained from <br />the tests sufficient for designing a groundwater pumping plan. In order to provide further <br />assurance that groundwater flow through the contaminated source zone can be captured <br />by the proposed extraction wells, we intend to model the extent of the anticipated capture <br />zone based on several pumping rates. The proposed analysis would utilize the program <br />MODFLOW® with a flow line depiction <br />tsubmipa meme, MOPATHO. As indicatd orandum report b November 20 n the <br />attached project schedule we planto <br />2. In the two most recent quarterly monitoring events, samples collected from well MW - <br />9 located just north of the source zone, yielded detections of 64 µg/L and 58 µg/L total <br />VOCs. This location is not bounded to the north by sample points with non -detect <br />analyses. Therefore, in response to your request for additional definition of the extent of <br />contamination, Parsons collected four additional groundwater samples from boreholes <br />arranged parallel to the north property line fence in the vicinity of MW -9. Sampling was <br />conducted on November 2 and 3, by <br />direOct push ne sammlehod was sing a collect colw stem lected theughaler dlolllw <br />rig and a HydropunchTM same P <br />groundwater zone in each boring. <br />3. A natural attenuation evaluation was performed in accordance with the Technical <br />Protocol for Evaluating Natural Attenuation of Chlorinated Solvents in Groun&vater <br />(Wiedemeier et al, 1996) as part of the 2nd 1998 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring <br />Report (Parsons, September 16, 1998). As discussed in the report, some evidence for <br />geochemical conditions favorable to natural attenuation was found, although it was <br />limited. Parsons plans to sample the newly installed extraction well, GW -2, and selected <br />other wells for additional evidence for natural attenuation as part of the 4th 1998 <br />quarterly sampling in mid-November. The quarterly monitoring report is scheduled to be <br />submitted January 6, 1999. However, and laboratory <br />ae otraroundwater from GW -2 byed and Decemberd to <br />18 <br />reach a decision on whether top p <br />contingent upon completion of all laboratory analytical work. A decision not to pump <br />from this well would be made only if the analyses indicate "adequate evidence for <br />\\11;NRA\\T <br />