Laserfiche WebLink
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY <br /> U.S.ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT,SACRAMENTO <br /> CORPS OF ENGINEERS <br /> 1326 J STREET <br /> 3 SACRAMENTO,CALIFORNIA 95814-2922 <br /> REM" <br /> ATTOMMOF <br /> May 18, 1995 MAY 2 2 1995 <br /> Engineering Division &VIF MIND`lArm <br /> METROPMITANAWMT <br /> Mr. Dan <br /> DeAngelis, Airport Manager <br /> er <br /> County of Sam. Joaquin <br /> AIA <br /> Stockton metro Olitan Airport <br /> 5000 South Airport Way <br /> toclten, al3ornia 9526- 9 <br /> Dear Mr. DeAngelis. <br /> We have reviewed your letter, dated May 3, 199 ,; inwhich <br /> you identified the underground storage tanks used by the may. <br /> Your _letter was forwarded in response to our verbal ec�ueat for <br /> .. <br /> information regarding the use of the underground storage tan <br /> ks <br /> s -facility the time the acility was used by the Department of the <br /> In your let-ter you noted that six of the underground tanks' <br /> _�Ie fuel farm had not been used since the Army vacated the <br /> . u leiter a� seg indicated. that all cif the twelve tanks <br /> e e o ed and that evidence of scall contamination was <br /> c rered when ,the tanks were removed. <br /> In reviewing -Le documentation which you provided, it <br /> spears that the fuel ;storage tanks that were beneficially used <br /> t. Stockton MetYopolitan Airport are in. close p xizity t <br /> the scrae tanks to at have' not' been. used since the u��arte of <br /> the Arm <br /> vacated the site. Due to the close proem 3_L �� the. <br /> undergr ,-i d storage tanks, it is difficult to dist aguish the <br /> source o* <br /> the car.ur ination. I addition, the information wh .ch <br /> You provided indicates that the soil contamination h e been <br /> caused. by --ur ?-nt site usage, and not by the Army' s usage.,of <br /> the tams dur J ng World War I I . <br /> r- <br /> Based on the information provided, my staff wild performs a. <br /> lilited record search to determine whether additional inforatio <br /> i available regarding the `soil contamination from the <br /> u derground storage tanks. In particular y staff Yet 11 <br /> roves t to whether additional information on the contaminated <br /> is available. At this time I m not proposing any further <br /> stigtion at the site beyond the limited record. search <br />