Laserfiche WebLink
3.0 MONITORING RESULTS SUMMARY <br /> 3.1 Groundwater Physical Cligracteristies and Grgundwater Gradient Contu <br /> Table 1 presents a summary of the groundwater physical characteristics and water level <br /> measurements collected at each well during the June 16, 1995 monitoring event <br /> TABLE 1 <br /> Field Monitoring Data <br /> Well pH Temperature Electrical Reference Elevation' Depth to Water June 1995 <br /> ID (units) (° F) Conductivity Top of Casing From Reference Water Elevation' <br /> (umhos) (feet) (feet) (feet) <br />' MW-1 7 73 656 876 2093 1 4287 -2194 <br /> MW-2 768 688 915 21 34 432 -21 86 <br /> MW-3 7 49 69 8 1079 21 07 42 88 -21 81 <br /> Notes <br /> `Elevations are given in feet relative to mean sea level (MSL) <br /> Groundwater elevations have increased an average of 0 9 feet since the last date when <br /> measurements were made (March 17, 1994) This increase in groundwater elevation reflects the <br /> recent, unusually high winter season rainfall in the San Joaquin Valley region <br /> The groundwater elevations were used to produce a contour map showing the groundwater <br /> surface at the facility relative to mean sea level (Figure 3) From the data, WESTON has <br /> calculated a horizontal gradient for the groundwater surface The average horizontal gradient <br /> at the site is 2 4 x 103 feet/foot with groundwater flow toward the north by northwest. In <br /> comparison to data collected in March 1995, the contour map shows the hydraulic gradient has <br /> decreased slightly from 3 0 to 2 4 x 10-3 ft/ft and the flow direction has rotated from slightly east <br /> of north to slightly west of north <br /> 3.2 Analytical Results <br /> All groundwater samples were analyzed for BTEX by EPA Method 8020 and for TPH-D by <br /> EPA Method 8015M The analytical results are summarized in Table 2 while the complete <br /> analytical report is presented in Appendix B <br /> L WROIEM1SANJOQ\TMAD-2ND QTR 4 3lulJ'X995 <br />