My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000048
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
7759
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0543382
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000048
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2018 11:44:16 AM
Creation date
10/24/2018 10:40:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0000048
FileName_PostFix
XR0000048
RECORD_ID
PR0543382
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003766
FACILITY_NAME
SJ CO MOSQUITO & VECTOR CTRL*
STREET_NUMBER
7759
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17705007
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7759 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Also of interest to this investigation was the removal of a 6,000 gallon gasoline tank (Tank 3) <br /> from along the north wall of the shop building and a 12,000 gallon aviation fuel tank (Tank 4) <br />' from the northwest corner of the shop building While the results of soil sampling from beneath <br /> each tank indicated that no volatile hydrocarbons were present in the sort, extractable <br /> hydrocarbons were inexplicably found A sample from the west end of Tank 3 allegedly <br /> contained 50 mg/Kg while a sample from the south end of Tank 4 contained 70 mg/Kg A <br />' review of available records does not indicate why extractable hydrocarbons were found at these <br /> locations nor if there was a possibilIt <br /> y-of-sample-mismanagement or analytical error <br />' 1.2 Hydrology <br /> The site is located in the south central portion of the San Joaquin County Groundwater Basin <br />' At the time of the remedial excavation project in April 1987, the water table was approximately <br /> 28 feet below grade as observed during the we same ing. However, based on water level <br /> measureme�n s�cotl r i ugus ,—groundwater rs currently 48 to 49 feet below ground <br />' surface (see Table 2) Based on these measurements, groundwater flow is to the north-northwest <br /> at the site (Figure 3) On a regional basis, according to the SJCFCD, publication, "Elevation <br /> of Water in Wells, Spring 1993", groundwater flows to the northeast in the vicinity of the site <br />' TABLE 2 9U17 <br /> Groundwater Elevations 8 +Gl <br /> ILocation Elevation Depth to Water Water Table <br /> (Top of Casing) (Feet) Elevation <br /> Feet MSL Feet MSL <br /> MW-1 2093 4797 -2704 <br />' MW-2 213 4794 -26.90 <br /> MW-3 2107 4824 -2687 <br /> 1.3 Scope of Work <br />' The scope of the field investigation was originally proposed by WESTON in a Work Plan dated <br /> February 14, 1994 Review and comment by the EHD led to a Revised Work Plan dated April <br /> 18, 1994 which adjusted the locations of MW-1 and MW-2 slightly and altered certain soil <br /> sampling procedures The modified work plan included the completion of four soil bonngs, the <br /> collection of two Hydropunch groundwater samples and installation of three monitor wells <br />' 2.0 SUMMARY OF FIELD ACTIVITIES <br /> WESTON installed three monitor wells and completed four soil borings between July 26 and <br /> July 29, 1994 Five soil samples were collected in brass sleeves from each of two soil borings <br /> I (SB-1 and SB-2) located as shown on Figure 2 near the former spray oil tank site and submitted <br /> for analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-D) and benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) Soil samples were also collected in brass sleeves at two <br /> depths (8 and 12 feet below grade) from each hydropunch boring (HP-1 and HP-2) located near <br /> the former gasoline (Tank 3) and aviation fuel tank (Tank 4) sites and analyzed for TPH-D and <br /> TPH-G Only the number of soil samples originally scheduled in the work plan were submitted <br /> for laboratory analysis as field screening results did not warrant the analysis of additional <br /> samples <br /> S'MXR"S\SICMvcDI SM 4 kon M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.