Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Infurna <br />From: Tim Berger [berger@versar.com] <br />Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 10:17 AM <br />To: Mlnfurna@sjcehd.com <br />Subject: Re: WORK PLAN FOR CAL GUARD IN STOCKTON Lo 1P - sb2-0 <br />Lo p _ 2,000 Ste-^" <br />Mike, it,k <br />zcr a 9-t ►,.M <br />Thank you for your review and getting back to us so quickly, your comments regarding <br />parceling of regulatory oversight are also appreciated. Marcus Pierce said he'd provide <br />his comments on the work plan by around the 12th of September. I will address both sets <br />of comments at one time upon recieving his. <br />Thank you for your patience, <br />- Tim <br />Tim Berger, R.G., R.E.A. <br />Program Manager <br />Versar, Inc. <br />Southwest Region <br />(916) 863-9323 <br />>>> Mike Infurna <MInfurna@sjcehd.com> 08/30/02 02:40PM >>> <br />I was kinda moving this one along since I won't be back in the office until <br />Wed, Sept 4th.. since I haven't heard from you regarding my confusion on the <br />work plan borings at OMS -24, I'll jot down my concerns here so you can <br />address them while I'm gone, especially if you're in a hurry to start.... <br />As I mentioned on the phone, I cannot issue permits on other lead agency <br />sites until I have that agency's approval. <br />Since you incorporated one work plan that crosses over two agency's <br />oversight, any approval EHD would provide would be limited to borings/wells <br />under our jurisdiction only... You could possibly mobilize for UST borings <br />with some incorrect assumption you could drill ALL the holes ... UST borings <br />permitted under EHD authority would be allowed ... the non -UST borings would <br />not be allowed and would not be on the permit .... I'd hoped to keep you from <br />multi -mobilizing for what you may consider the same phase ... see? <br />I can understand soil borings "B-30, B-31, and B-32" since they surround the <br />former UST complex at 8020 S. Airport Rd, (aka OMS -24) ... it's "B-33 and <br />B-34' that don't seem to fit into the UST investigation. If you can support <br />their link to the UST investigation, as if in 'lateral delineation' or the <br />like, I will listen. But why not laterally investigate the other quadrants? <br />and what makes you think your UST impact is there? But if you can't support <br />these two as UST borings, then the CVRWQCB is the agency to evaluate and <br />approve them and I can issue a permit under their lead agency status <br />approval. <br />ok? <br />and just in case you're thinking of drilling very soon, like next week or <br />the week after, I'll need the permit application, the second page of it, the <br />LCD, and the $89 check per application and time to process it all before I <br />can confirm a drill appointment.... <br />as a precaution and a help, here are those blank forms you'll need. <br />UST permits to UST sites... Regional board sites get separate permits if not <br />done at the same time and by the same C-57 contractor. <br />Each parcel/address gets it's own permit application and each application <br />needs it's own check too ... (ie: 8020 Airport and 2000 Stimson are separate <br />sites .... I'm not sure if CSMS is too .... I know the Armory is 8010 <br />Airport.... <br />