My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
8010
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0526994
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2018 2:39:18 PM
Creation date
10/24/2018 11:49:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0526994
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0018291
FACILITY_NAME
FMS #24 (OMS)
STREET_NUMBER
8010
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17726029
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
8010 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
WNg
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Treatability Study Report and Feasibility Evaluation for <br />In Situ Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation <br />Field Maintenance Shop #24, 8020 South Airport Way <br />Stockton. California <br />Advective airflow was observed in all the monitoring points with induced vacuums greater than <br />0.1 in. w.c. The greatest advective airflow recorded during testing of FMS-SVE1 was in well <br />FMS-DPE1. At an extraction wellhead vacuum of 60 in. w.c. and an induced vacuum of 2.75 in <br />w.c. in well FMS-DPE1, a 1 -liter Tedlar® bag attached to the wellhead deflated in 38 seconds <br />(airflow of 1.58 liters per minute [L/min]). At FMS-MW4, the most distant well with a measurable <br />vacuum response, a 1 -liter Tedlar° bag attached to the wellhead deflated in 4 minutes and <br />40 seconds (airflow of 0.21 L/min). Please see the Pilot Test Summary Data sheets in <br />Appendix F for advective airflow measurements in seconds and in L/min in the observation <br />wells. <br />3.2.4. Field Measurements of Vapor Concentrations <br />During the SVE testing at well FMS-SVE1, the extracted soil vapor was monitored with a hand- <br />held PID and a GasTech GT -408 multi -meter. The VOC concentrations measured at FMS-SVE1 <br />using the MiniRae 2000 PID (calibrated with 100-ppmv isobutylene) decreased from 272 ppmv <br />at the beginning of testing to 235 ppmv at the end of testing. Readings collected using the <br />GT -408 meter decreased from 1,980 ppmv (2% LEL, as methane) midway through the testing to <br />787 ppmv (2% LEL, as methane) at the end of testing. <br />Vapor concentrations measured in the field were recorded on field logs and are summarized in <br />the Pilot Test Summary Data sheets included in Appendix F. <br />3.2.5. Vapor Sample Results <br />In addition to the field monitoring, two Tedlar® bag samples were collected from FMS-SVE1 for <br />laboratory analysis at the start and end of the SVE test. TPH-g decreased from 1,100 ppmv in <br />the initial sample to 750 ppmv in the final sample. The benzene concentration in soil vapor <br />decreased from 11 ppmv to 6 ppmv over the course of testing at FMS-SVE1. <br />A Tedlar® bag sample was collected at each short duration test well prior to completion of the <br />testing. TPH-g results were 1,100 ppmv for FMS-MW5, 1,100 ppmv for FMS-DPE1, and 120 <br />ppmv for FMS-DPE2. <br />The soil vapor analytical results for testing at are summarized in Table 4. The laboratory <br />analytical reports and chain -of -custody documents are provided in Appendix C. <br />3.2.6. Radius of Influence for Vapor Extraction <br />Induced vacuum measurements collected from the observation wells during the SVE test <br />performed at FMS-SVE1 have been plotted on versus the distance from the extraction well <br />(Graph 1). The ROI determination method, referenced in this document as the 1% method," <br />defines the ROI as the radial distance corresponding to a practical fraction of the observation <br />well vacuum to the test well vacuum (0.01 or 1 %) as interpolated from the fitted distribution line <br />plotted against radial distance from the extraction well on a semi -log graph (LaGrega, 1994). <br />The induced vacuum measurements collected from the observation wells during SVE testing <br />from well FMS-SVE1 have been expressed as a fraction of the test well vacuum of 55 in. w.c. <br />and plotted versus the distance from the extraction well (Graph 1). Based on the plot, the ROI is <br />depicted at 60 feet (Figure 6), as defined by the 1% method. <br />The induced vacuum results at FMS-MW5, as discussed in Section 3.2.2, were omitted in the <br />analysis of SVE ROI because of the location of the screened interval. <br />OTI E 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.