Laserfiche WebLink
Treatability Study Report and Feasibility Evaluation for <br />In Situ Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation <br />Field Maintenance Shop #24, 8020 South Airport Way <br />Stockton, California <br />4.0 AIR SPARGE TREATABILITY TEST <br />4.1. EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION <br />Pilot test equipment installed at the site for the air sparge test included an air compressor, <br />desiccant dryer (used to remove oil/water), oil/water coalescing filter, pressure regulator, valves, <br />pressure gauges, temperature gauge, air hose, and Dwyer° Series VF Visi-Float° rotameters <br />with flow ranges between 0 to 40 and 0 to 50 scfm. Equipment also included tanks of <br />compressed helium, a pressure regulator, and a Dwyer° Series VF Visi-Float° rotameter used <br />for helium tracer gas injection. <br />The air compressor used for the test was a 49 horsepower, diesel powered, trailer -mounted unit <br />rated at 160 cubic feet per minute (cfm) at 100 pounds per square inch gauge (psig). The line <br />leading from the compressor to the AS wells was a 50 -foot length of 1 -inch flexible compressed <br />air hose. The helium hose was connected to the air sparge manifold upstream of the air sparge <br />flow meter. <br />Monitoring equipment used during the test included four In Situ, Inc. Troll® 9500 transducers <br />fitted with Rugged Dissolved Oxygen probes, a MiniRae® 2000 PID calibrated with 100 ppmv <br />isobutylene calibration gas, a GasTecho GT -408 multi -gas meter calibrated with 2.5% methane <br />(by volume) calibration gas, a Radiodete° ction MGD -2002 helium detector, a 100 -foot water <br />level meter, and Dwyer° Magnehelic pressure/vacuum gauges with various measurement <br />ranges. <br />Prior to conducting air sparge testing, the Troll® 9500 multi -parameter groundwater quality <br />monitor including an optical dissolved oxygen probes 1.5 feet off the bottoms of wells <br />FMS-MW1, FMS-MW5, FMS-DPE1, and FMS-DPE2. The transducers were used to record <br />water level (measured as feet of water column above the sensor) and dissolved oxygen <br />(milligrams per liter [mg/L]) at 30 -second intervals before, during, and after air sparge testing. <br />Wells FMS-MW1, FMS-MW2, FMS-MW4, FMS-MW5, FMS-DPE1, FMS-DPE2, and FMS-SVE1 <br />were fitted with PVC slip caps with sample ports for monitoring induced pressures and field <br />sample collection. <br />4.2. TESTING PROCEDURES <br />After conducting pre-test sampling/monitoring and shakedown of the equipment, pilot testing <br />was started by initiating air flow into the air sparge well FMS-AS1A (screened from 37 to 39 feet <br />bgs). Sparging at well FMS-AS1 B (screened from 64 to 66 feet bgs) was conducted on the <br />second day of air sparge testing. At each well, injection air pressure was incrementally <br />increased to determine the breakthrough pressure required to induce air flow into the sparge <br />well. Based on initial groundwater elevation and the depth of the AS well screens, the minimum <br />theoretical pressure required to displace the water from the casing is 6.65 feet of water column <br />(2.88 psig) at well FMS-AS1A and 33.59 feet of water column (14.55 psig) (not including <br />pressure required to overcome the formation and sand pack resistance). <br />Breakthrough pressure was observed at approximately 27 psig in well FMS-AS1A and 60 psig <br />in well FMS-AS1 B. Actual breakthrough pressure was greater than the minimum theoretical <br />pressure due to the additional pressure caused by the piping, well slots, annular filter pack, and <br />aquifer/formation properties. <br />Following testing, the caps were briefly removed from wells FMS-DPE1, FMS-DPE2 and <br />FMS-MW5, and the wells were visually inspected for bubbling using a handheld spotlight. <br />Bubbling in the water column of nearby wells is a sign of air sparge influence. <br />OTIE 20 <br />