Laserfiche WebLink
Treatability Study Report and Feasibility Evaluation for <br />In Situ Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation <br />Field Maintenance Shop #24, 8020 South Airport Way <br />Stockton, California <br />• Vacuum in well FMS-DPE2 (48.00 feet from FMS- DPE1) increased from 0.0 to 0.80 in. w.c. <br />by the end of testing. <br />• Vacuum in well FMS-MW1 (92.49 feet from FMS- DPE1) increased from 0.04 to 0.45 in. w.c. <br />by the end of testing. <br />• Vacuum in well FMS-MW2 (110.21 feet from FMS- DPE1) increased from 0.01 to 0.15 in. <br />w.c. by the end of testing. <br />• Vacuum in well FMS-MW4 (189.23 feet from FMS- DPE1) increased from +0.01 in. w.c. <br />(pressure) to 0.065 in. w.c. (vacuum) by the end of testing. <br />The induced vacuums listed above were used to determine the vapor extraction radius of <br />influence using the "1 % method" described in Section 3.2.6. of this report. <br />A summary of field data is provided in the HVDPE Test Summary Data sheets in Appendix F. <br />5.3.4. Radius of Influence for Vapor Extraction <br />The vapor extraction ROI for HVDPE testing was determined based on applied and induced <br />vacuums measured during testing at wells FMS-MW5 and FMS-DPE1 by applying the 1% <br />method", as described in Section 3.2.6. of this report. At steady-state operating conditions of <br />204 in. w.c. applied vacuum and 40 scfm vapor extraction flow rate, the ROI of vapor extraction <br />during HVDPE testing at FMS-MW5 was estimated at 7 feet, as shown in Graph 4. At steady- <br />state operating conditions of 35 in. w.c. applied vacuum and 53 scfm vapor extraction flow rate, <br />the ROI of vapor extraction during HVDPE testing at FMS-DPE1 was estimated at 100 feet, as <br />shown in Graph 5. <br />The discrepancy between ROI calculated for vapor extraction at FMS-MW5 and FMS-DPE1 is <br />likely due to the differences in screened intervals between the two wells. Well FMS-DPE1 is <br />screened from 20.1 to 60.1 feet bgs, intercepting the entire upper sand interval which was <br />encountered between 21 and 28.5 feet bgs during well installation. At the location of FMS-MW5, <br />the upper sand interval was found to extend from 20 to 25 feet bgs; however the top of the <br />screen is set at 27.5 feet bgs, within the fine grained materials encountered below the upper <br />sand interval. Therefore based on this evaluation of FMS-MW5, the HVDPE ROI is 100 feet <br />(based on FMS-DPE1 results). <br />The HVDPE ROI is illustrated in Figure 8. <br />5.3.5. Advective Airflow <br />During the FMS-MW5 HVDPE test, advective airflow was measured in all the monitoring points <br />where induced vacuum greater than or equal to 0.10 in. w.c. was observed. Measurements <br />were taken under stable conditions near the middle of testing. The greatest recorded advective <br />airflow was recorded in well FMS-DPE1, located 22.16 feet from FMS-MW5. At an extraction <br />wellhead vacuum of 14 in. Hg and an induced vacuum of 1.35 in w.c., a 1 -liter Tedlar® bag <br />attached to the wellhead of FMS-DPE1 deflated in 43 seconds (airflow of 1.4 liters per minute <br />[L/min]). Well FMS-MW1 was the most distant well with a vacuum response over 0.10 in. w.c. At <br />an applied vacuum of 14 in. Hg and an induced vacuum of 0.10 in. w.c., a 1 -liter Tedlar° bag <br />attached to the FMS-MW1 wellhead deflated in 380 seconds (airflow of 0.16 L/min). Please see <br />the Pilot Test Summary Data sheets in Appendix F for advective airflow measurements in <br />seconds and in L/min in the observation wells. <br />OTI E 32 <br />