Laserfiche WebLink
Treatability Study Report and Feasibility Evaluation for <br />In Situ Petroleum Hydrocarbon Remediation <br />Field Maintenance Shop #24, 8020 South Airport Way <br />5.4.2. Calculation of Aquifer Test Parameters <br />The model used for the analyses was Cooper -Jacob Straight Line Method. The hydrogeology in <br />the immediate area that wells FMS-MW5 and FMS-DPE1 are screened through is unconfined to <br />semi -confined. Because the drawdown observed in the wells is small in comparison to the <br />saturated thickness, the Cooper -Jacob Straight Line Method is applicable to unconfined to semi - <br />confined water -bearing units (Jacob, 1950). <br />Transmissivity is the rate at which a fluid of a specific viscosity and density is transmitted <br />through a width of an aquifer at a specific hydraulic gradient. Transmissivity ranged from <br />11.3 gallons per day per foot (gpd/ft) at well FMS-MW5 and 36.9 gpd/ft at well FMS-DPE1. <br />Hydraulic conductivity is the volume of water that will move through a porous medium in unit <br />time, under unit hydraulic gradient, and perpendicular to the direction of flow (Kruseman and <br />De Ridder, 2000). Hydraulic conductivity is the quotient of transmissivity and saturated <br />thickness of the aquifer. The saturated thickness of the aquifer is assumed to be the wetted <br />screen interval of the well. The hydraulic conductivity ranged from 0.41 gallons per day per <br />square foot (gpd/ftz) at well FMS-MW5 and 1.2 gpd/ft2 at well FMS-DPE1. <br />Specific capacity is the ratio between the pump rate and drawdown (the difference in feet <br />between the static pre-test and relatively steady-state pumping water levels in the pumping well) <br />and is a relative measure of efficiency to determine optimal pump rates. Because the <br />groundwater level declined below the transducers installed in both wells FMS-MW5 and <br />FMS-DPE1 during the pumping tests, a calculated groundwater level was used to determine the <br />specific capacity of each well. For well FMS-MW5, the predicted maximum drawdown during <br />pumping at 0.75 gpm was 24.2 feet. For well FMS-DPE1 the predicted maximum drawdown <br />during pumping at 2.0 gpm was 26.4 feet. The specific capacity at well FMS-MW5 was 0.031 <br />gpm per foot, and at well FMS-DPE1, 0.076 gpm per foot. <br />Recovery analysis plots are presented for tests on both wells in Appendix H. The findings <br />presented above for transmissivity, hydraulic conductivity and specific capacity are consistent <br />with findings from historical soil and groundwater investigations at the site, and identify the <br />aquifer as generally poor in character and characterized by semi -permeable fine sand and silty <br />materials. It must be noted that the aquifer properties calculated in these hydrogeologic <br />analyses are based on vacuum enhanced groundwater extraction, and therefore, should only <br />apply to this site for evaluation of groundwater extraction under high vacuum conditions. <br />35 <br />OTI E <br />