Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Marcus Pierce, Engineering Sogist February 2012 <br />Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br />Subject: Copper Sulfate Impacted Soil Removal <br />"Hazcat" field tests indicated the substance contained elevated concentrations of copper, later <br />tentatively identified as copper sulfate, a pesticide with reportedly no other hazardous <br />properties, but which is toxic if ingested. The areal and vertical extent was not determined, and <br />the powder was subsequently re -buried after sampling was completed. Versar recommended <br />removal of an estimated 100 cubic yards of copper impacted soil for disposal at a Class I <br />landfill. <br />In October 2005, Versar returned to the site and removed copper impacted soil with <br />concentrations exceeding 9,200 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) at the three pavement <br />upwelling areas (Versar, 2006). The final excavations measured 25 feet by 15 feet by 10 feet <br />deep (main excavation), and 2.5 feet by 6 feet by 3 feet deep for each of the two smaller <br />excavations. Locations of the three excavations are depicted on Figure 3 (Attachment A). <br />Approximately 100 cubic yards (130.85 tons) of impacted soil were removed from the site and <br />delivered to Chemical Waste Management, Inc. landfill. During excavation activities, buried <br />debris was encountered in the southwest portion of the main excavation, later identified as <br />aircraft parts, and stockpiled for disposal. <br />Excavation of copper sulfate impacted soil was discontinued once the limits of the General <br />Service Administration contract for waste disposal were reached. A visible seam of suspected <br />copper sulfate was observed in the west wall of the completed excavation. The CA ARNG did <br />not expect to remove all copper sulfate impacted soil during this mobilization, and following <br />discussions between Versar and the CA ARNG regarding the remaining copper sulfate in soil, <br />additional excavation was not performed. Confirmatory samples were collected from the floor of <br />all three excavations, and the north, south, and east sidewalls of the main excavation prior to <br />backfill using visually unimpacted excavated soil, mechanical compaction, and resurfacing with <br />asphalt. <br />Laboratory analysis of the confirmatory samples identified 13 metals with concentrations above <br />the method detection limits (MDLs), including arsenic concentrations ranging from 5.04 to 7.63 <br />mg/kg, exceeding the US EPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goal (PRG) for Industrial Soil <br />(1.6 mg/kg). The confirmatory samples indicated that the copper sulfate impacted soils were <br />fully removed in all directions except to the west, as anticipated. <br />GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED REMEDIAL ACTIVITIES <br />Upon approval of this Work Plan, preparation for remedial activities will be implemented. The <br />objective for the proposed work is to complete the copper sulfate impacted soil removal initiated <br />by Versar in 2005. Activities associated with this effort will be performed in strict conformance <br />with an Accident Prevention Plan/Site Safety and Health Plan developed under the oversight of, <br />and approved by, OTIE's Corporate Health and Safety Manager, and will consist of subsurface <br />utility locating, pre -characterizing copper sulfate material (for disposal purposes) and collecting <br />a groundwater grab sample beneath the excavation using direct push technique, excavating <br />copper sulfate impacted soil (based exclusively on soil coloration), confirmatory soil sampling, <br />backfilling with clean import soil, and restoring the rough asphalt surface. <br />The proposed excavation area (Figure 3) will be properly marked prior to notifying Underground <br />Service Alert about proposed subsurface excavation activities. A private underground <br />subsurface utility locator will be contracted to determine if any underground utilities (water, <br />sewer, telecommunications, cable television, electric and gas) or other obstructions are located <br />within the proposed excavation footprint. Any subsurface utilities observed within the excavation <br />Oneida Total Integrated Enterprises, LLC Page 2 of 6 <br />