Laserfiche WebLink
i. <br /> i� <br /> have been during refueling of vehicles andliwoul,d have been contained <br /> by the retaining wall and driveway, and prompti.y cleaned up. <br /> SUMMARY: <br /> 1. The UST that was removed from thero ert <br /> P �� P Y appeared to be in � <br /> excellent condition; : there was no visible evidence of soil <br /> discoloration when the tank was removed. '? <br /> 2. The soil sample from the south end of the tank, (TS,) tested <br /> clean. <br /> 3. The sample from the north ,end of the tank had relatively low <br /> levels of EDB, Xylene, and TVPH. <br /> I <br /> 4. A chemical analysis of a water sample obtained from the private <br /> well on the property located approximately 75, feet from the tank <br /> site showed that tests for BTX&E, EDB, TPH-G, and Organic lead were <br /> all below reporting limits. . <br /> i3 <br /> 5. There was no evidence of water or moisture in the hole during or <br /> after excavation. �1 <br /> _ CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on the above data, it appears that additional work at this <br /> site is not warranted. <br /> r Yours truly <br /> William J. Hunter � <br /> cc: Margaret Russell <br /> Thorpe Oil <br /> ii <br /> k <br /> C <br /> IP <br /> :j <br /> 4I <br />