Laserfiche WebLink
of the tank under Chain-of-Custody by Calnoni'e Laboratory personel , <br /> (Exhibit F, ) with instructions to be analyzed for BTX&E, TRH-G, EDB, <br /> and organic lead, as required by the SJLHD. Because of the fact that <br /> the tank was immediately adjacent to the pumps,, (Plates VII & VIII,) <br /> no sample was taken on the fill line. The tank removal and sampling <br /> was witnessed by Jaime Favla (sp?) of thIe SJ3LHD. Approximately 14 <br /> cubic yards of soil was removed from thelexcavation; after the tank i <br /> was pulled, and samples taken, the sail was returned to the hole. <br /> Approximately 7 cubic yards of clean filly was added to replace the <br /> 1 volume occupied by the removed tank, and the site was returned to <br /> grade the same day. <br /> i <br /> RESULTS OF SAMPLE ANALYSIS k <br /> The results of the laboratory anlysis performed on the above samples <br /> are tabulated on Table I. All tested components from the sample at <br /> the south end of the tank were below reporting limits; very minor <br /> amounts of Ethylbenzene, Xylene, and TPH were detected in the sample <br /> i[ from the north end of the tank. <br /> � S <br /> On October 7, 1999, Jim Thorpe Oil , Iri'c, wrote to the CRWQCB, <br /> stating that the small amount of contamination in the soil samples <br /> did not warrant further site investigation, and requested that the <br /> owners be relieved of any further work at the location; (refer to <br /> Exhibit F. ) As a result of telephone conversations between Richard <br /> Thorpe and Thomas Peltier of the CRWQCH, a sample was taken from the <br /> domestic water well on the property, (refer ', to Plate VI, ) by Dr. <br /> John Bartell of McLaren Environmental andIanal'yzed for BTX&E, TPH-G, <br /> EDB, and organic lead. The results revealed that all components <br /> were below reporting limits; table II lists the results in tabular <br /> form. <br /> PLUME SIZE AND CONFIGURATION: i <br /> i <br /> The writer did not witness the removall� of .the tank, but it was <br /> reported that no discoloration of sail was noted. It appears that <br /> only a minor amount of spillage occurred; and, that a plume as such <br /> did not exist at this location. <br /> ESTIMATE OF AMOUNT OF PRODUCT LEAKAGE: , <br /> The owners of the property are deceased, and to the writer's <br /> knowledge, there are no records available with which to determine <br /> the amount of fuel used during the time the tank was in place, or to <br /> estimate any spillage that may have occurred. Because the tank was <br /> in excellent condition when removed, and no evidence of leakage or <br /> soil discoloration was noted, it can be assumed that any product <br /> leakage was of a very minor amount. As ,shown on Plates VI, VII & <br /> VIII , the pumps were located immediately adjacent to the driveway. <br /> It is most likely that any spills that ,might have occurred would <br /> 3 <br /> 1 <br />