Laserfiche WebLink
.j <br /> ' Ell <br /> 'f <br /> have been during refueling of vehicles and mould have been contained <br /> by the retaining wall and driveway, and promptly cleaned up'. <br /> SUMMARY: II <br /> 'S <br /> 1 . The UST that was removed from the property appeared to be in <br />' excellent condition; there was no visibleo evidence of soil <br /> discoloration when the tank was removed. <br /> 2. The soil sample from the south end of the tank, (TS, ) tested <br /> clean. ii, <br /> I <br /> 3. The sample from the north end of the� tank had relatively low <br /> levels of EDB, Xylene, and TVFH. <br /> 4. A chemical analysis of a water sample obtained from the private <br /> well on the property located approximately 75 feet from the tank <br /> site showed that tests for BTX&E, EDB, TPH-'�G, and Organic lead were <br /> all below reporting limits. . ;I <br /> 4' 5. There 'was no evidence of water or mai shire in the hole during or <br /> after excavation. <br /> CONCLUSIONS ` <br /> Based on the above data, it appears thatadditional work at this <br /> site is not warranted. <br /> I <br /> Volrs truly <br /> iy <br /> �t <br /> E <br /> William J. Hunter , <br /> cc: Margaret Russell <br /> I <br /> Thorpe Oil <br /> h <br /> i <br /> �r <br /> 11 <br /> I{ <br /> I'. <br /> i- <br /> k �r <br /> i <br /> 4 <br /> L <br />